Evidence map›Paper›PMID 3360851›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of cell biology1988

Mechanical properties of brain tubulin and microtubules.

M Sato, W H Schwartz, S C Selden, T D Pollard

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of cell biology, 1988. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Mechanical Properties of the Cytoskeleton and Cells.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2017
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. A serial micropipette microfluidic device with applications to cancer cell repeated deformation studies.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2013
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Anisotropic elastic properties of microtubules.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2005
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Vibrations in microtubules.Journal of biological physics · 1997
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Gravitational symmetry breaking in microtubular dissipative structures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1992
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M SatoDepartment of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.
W H Schwartz
S C Selden
T D Pollard
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF CELLULAR MOTILITYR01GM026338 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI POLLARD, THOMAS D. · 1985 to 2020
$9.8M
Mechanism of cytokinesis in fission yeastR01GM026132 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI POLLARD, THOMAS D. · 1985 to 2021
$8.8M
ACTIN-MYOSIN INTERACTIONS IN CELL MOTILITYR37GM026132 · NIGMS · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI POLLARD, THOMAS D. · 1988 to 1997
–
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-26132NIGMS NIH HHS GM-26338
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We measured the elasticity and viscosity of brain tubulin solutions under various conditions with a cone and plate rheometer using both oscillatory and steady shearing modes. Microtubules composed of purified tubulin, purified tubulin with taxol and 3x cycled microtubule protein from pig, cow, and chicken behaved as mechanically indistinguishable viscoelastic materials. Microtubules composed of pure tubulin and heat stable microtubule-associated proteins were also similar but did not recover their mechanical properties after shearing like other samples, even after 60 min. All of the other microtubule samples were more rigid after flow orientation, suggesting that the mechanical properties of anisotropic arrays of microtubules may be substantially greater than those of randomly arranged microtubules. These experiments confirm that MAPs do not cross link microtubules. Surprisingly, under conditions where microtubule assembly is strongly inhibited (either 5 degrees or at 37 degrees C with colchicine or Ca++) tubulin was mechanically indistinguishable from microtubules at 10-20 microM concentration. By electron microscopy and ultracentrifugation these samples were devoid of microtubules or other obvious structures. However, these mechanical data are strong evidence that tubulin will spontaneously assemble into alternate structures (aggregates) in nonpolymerizing conditions. Because unpolymerized tubulin is found in significant quantities in the cytoplasm, it may contribute significantly to the viscoelastic properties of cytoplasm, especially at low deformation rates.

Indexed as

AnimalsElasticityMicroscopy, ElectronMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMicrotubulesRheologyTime FactorsTubulinViscosityMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsTubulin

Identifiers

PMID3360851
PMCPMC2115020
OpenAlexW2162854537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.