Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33608434›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice2021

Adjusting the dose in paediatric care: dispersing four different aspirin tablets and taking a proportion.

Jørgen Brustugun, Nikolai Notaker, Lasse Holtan Paetz, Ingunn Tho, Kathrin Bjerknes

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jørgen BrustugunOslo Hospital Pharmacy, Hospital Pharmacies Enterprise, South Eastern Norway, Oslo, Norway jorgen.brustugun@sykehusapotekene.no.
Nikolai NotakerDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Lasse Holtan PaetzDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ingunn ThoSchool of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4241-4183
Kathrin BjerknesHospital Pharmacy Enterprises Norway, Lørenskog, Norway.
University of Oslo · NOOslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWhen caring for children in a hospital setting, tablets are often manipulated at the ward to obtain the right dose. One example is manipulation of tablets containing the slightly water-soluble substance aspirin, used in paediatric care as an antiplatelet agent. The evidence base, however, for choosing certain tablet formulations and manipulation methods over others for extraction of proportions is lacking. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of tablet formulation and manipulation technique on the dose accuracy and precision attained when dispersing different commercially available aspirin tablets and extracting a small proportion suitable for children.

methodsThe manipulation methods investigated simulated those observed in the paediatric clinic. Four tablet formulations-one chewable, one conventional and two dispersible-were dispersed in 10 mL water in a medicine measure. On (1) passive dispersion, (2) mixing by stirring with the syringe, or (3) stirring and pumping the dispersion in and out of the syringe, respectively, proportions (1 mL or 2 mL) were extracted and the doses recovered were determined using a validated UHPLC (ultra high-pressure liquid chromatography) method.

resultsFractions from the four different dispersed aspirin tablet formulations varied from 99% to 3% of that intended with the lowest degree of mixing, and from 96% to 34% of that intended with the highest degree of mixing. Only the dispersible tablets gave average doses within 20% of the intended dose.

conclusionsFraction extraction from dispersed aspirin tablets only gave doses within 20% of intended for the dispersible tablets, and then only for some of the manipulation methods: 'passive dispersion' for the 75 mg dispersible tablet and 'stirring and pumping' for the 300 mg dispersible tablet. The tablets not intended for dispersion gave unsatisfactory results, outside 20%, regardless of manipulation method. The findings underline the importance of considering both tablet formulation and dose extraction technique when manipulations are required.

Indexed as

AspirinPediatricsChildChromatography, High Pressure LiquidHumansTabletsAspirinTabletsclinical pharmacydispensing formsdrug administration (others)drug formulationpaediatricspharmaceutical excipients

Identifiers

PMID33608434
PMCPMC7907695
OpenAlexW2953209837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.