Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33608401›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Factors influencing allied health professionals' implementation of upper limb sensory rehabilitation for stroke survivors: a qualitative study to inform knowledge translation.

Liana S Cahill, Leeanne M Carey, Yvonne Mak-Yuen, Annie McCluskey, Cheryl Neilson, Denise A O'Connor, Natasha A Lannin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Increasing Access to FASD-Informed Care: Bringing an Adapted Intervention to Mental Health Providers.Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Liana S CahillOccupational Therapy, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia liana.cahill@acu.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-1730-9843
Leeanne M CareyOccupational Therapy, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6376-8613
Yvonne Mak-YuenOccupational Therapy, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0476-1769
Annie McCluskeySydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9719-6657
Cheryl NeilsonOccupational Therapy, Rural Department of Allied Health, Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0479-4149
Denise A O'ConnorMonash Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Institute, Malvern, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6836-122X
Natasha A LanninDepartment of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2066-8345

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSomatosensory loss is common after stroke with one-in-two individuals affected. Although clinical practice guidelines recommend providing somatosensory rehabilitation, this impairment often remains unassessed and untreated. To address the gap between guideline recommendations and clinical practice, this study sought to understand the factors influencing delivery of evidence-based upper limb sensory rehabilitation after stroke.

designQualitative study involving focus groups and interviews. Data analysis used an inductive approach (thematic analysis) and deductive analysis using implementation theory (the Theoretical Domains Framework and Normalisation Process Theory).

settingEight healthcare organisations in metropolitan and regional areas of Victoria and New South Wales, Australia.

participantsEighty-seven rehabilitation therapists (79% occupational therapists and 21% physiotherapists) were purposively sampled and participated in a knowledge translation study with staggered recruitment from 2014 to 2018.

resultsThree types of factors influenced therapists' delivery of upper limb somatosensory rehabilitation: individual ('The uncertain, unskilled therapist'), patient ('Patient understanding and priorities

conclusionsOccupational therapists and physiotherapists hold valuable insights towards practice change in somatosensory rehabilitation from the 'frontline'. Therapists experience barriers to change including a lack of knowledge and skills, lack of resources and organisational pressures. Facilitators for change were identified, including social support and therapists' perceived legitimacy in using new somatosensory rehabilitation approaches. Results will inform the design of a tailored implementation strategy to increase the use of evidence-based somatosensory rehabilitation in Australia. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12615000933550).

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationAllied Health PersonnelAttitude of Health PersonnelHumansNew South WalesSurvivorsTranslational Research, BiomedicalUpper ExtremityVictorianeurological injuryrehabilitation medicinestroke

Identifiers

PMID33608401
PMCPMC7896620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.