Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33608043›Full record

ArticleBioData mining2021

Performance of model-based multifactor dimensionality reduction methods for epistasis detection by controlling population structure.

Fentaw Abegaz, François Van Lishout, Jestinah M Mahachie John, Kridsadakorn Chiachoompu, Archana Bhardwaj, Diane Duroux, Elena S Gusareva, Zhi Wei, Hakon Hakonarson, Kristel Van Steen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioData mining, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Frontiers in genetics · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Fentaw AbegazGIGA-R, Medical Genomics - BIO3, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium. fentawabegaz@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6294-4360
François Van LishoutGIGA-R, Medical Genomics - BIO3, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Jestinah M Mahachie JohnGIGA-R, Medical Genomics - BIO3, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Kridsadakorn ChiachoompuGIGA-R, Medical Genomics - BIO3, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Archana BhardwajGIGA-R, Medical Genomics - BIO3, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Diane DurouxGIGA-R, Medical Genomics - BIO3, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Elena S GusarevaGIGA-R, Medical Genomics - BIO3, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Zhi WeiDepartment of Computer Science, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA.
Hakon HakonarsonCenter for Applied Genomics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Kristel Van SteenGIGA-R, Medical Genomics - BIO3, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
University of Liège · BEChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USNew Jersey Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique 2.4609.11
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn genome-wide association studies the extent and impact of confounding due to population structure have been well recognized. Inadequate handling of such confounding is likely to lead to spurious associations, hampering replication, and the identification of causal variants. Several strategies have been developed for protecting associations against confounding, the most popular one is based on Principal Component Analysis. In contrast, the extent and impact of confounding due to population structure in gene-gene interaction association epistasis studies are much less investigated and understood. In particular, the role of nonlinear genetic population substructure in epistasis detection is largely under-investigated, especially outside a regression framework.

methodsTo identify causal variants in synergy, to improve interpretability and replicability of epistasis results, we introduce three strategies based on a model-based multifactor dimensionality reduction approach for structured populations, namely MBMDR-PC, MBMDR-PG, and MBMDR-GC.

resultsSimulation results comparing the performance of various approaches show that in the presence of population structure MBMDR-PC and MBMDR-PG consistently better control type I error rate at the nominal level than MBMDR-GC. Moreover, our proposed three methods of population structure correction outperform MDR-SP in terms of statistical power.

conclusionWe demonstrate through extensive simulation studies the effect of various degrees of genetic population structure and relatedness on epistasis detection and propose appropriate remedial measures based on linear and nonlinear sample genetic similarity.

Indexed as

ConfoundingEpistasisGene-gene interactionGWAISGWASMB-MDRPopulation stratificationPopulation structurePrincipal components

Identifiers

PMID33608043
PMCPMC7893746
OpenAlexW3127298785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.