Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33608034›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2021

Does the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System improve patients' outcome following laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer? A multicentre, retrospective analysis with propensity score matching.

Keisuke Kazama, Masakatsu Numata, Toru Aoyama, Yosuke Atsumi, Hiroshi Tamagawa, Teni Godai, Hiroyuki Saeki, Yusuke Saigusa, Manabu Shiozawa, Norio Yukawa and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Impact of Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification on Laparoscopic Resections for Rectal Cancer in Japan: The EnSSURE Study.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Keisuke KazamaDepartment of Surgery, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan.
Masakatsu NumataDepartment of Surgery, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan. masakatsunumata@hotmail.co.jp.
Toru AoyamaDepartment of Surgery, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan.
Yosuke AtsumiDepartment of Surgery, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan.
Hiroshi TamagawaDepartment of Surgery, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan.
Teni GodaiDepartment of Surgery, Fujisawa Shounandai Hospital, Fujisawa, Japan.
Hiroyuki SaekiDepartment of Surgery, Yokohama Minami Kyosai Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Yusuke SaigusaDepartment of Biostatistics, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.
Manabu ShiozawaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Norio YukawaDepartment of Surgery, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan.
Munetaka MasudaDepartment of Surgery, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan.
Yasushi RinoDepartment of Surgery, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan.
Yokohama City University · JPFujisawa City Hospital · JPKanagawa Cancer CenterYokohama Minami Kyosai Hospital · JP

Funding

Dr. Masumi Kamachi (Tokyo Shinagawa Hospital) Not applicableDr. Nobuko Yoshiki (Yoshiki Dermatology Clinic Ginza) Not applicableDr. Ryuji Tominaga (Fukuoka Wajiro Hospital) Not applicableNon-governmental organisation Yokohama Surgical Research Group Not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to investigate the short-term and oncological impact of the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS) by the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery on the operator performing laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study was based on medical records from a multicentre database. A total of 417 patients diagnosed with stage II/III colon and rectosigmoid cancer treated with curative resection were divided into two groups according to whether they were operated on by qualified surgeons (Q group, n=352) or not (NQ group, n=65). Through strict propensity score matching, 98 cases (49 in each group) were assessed.

resultsOperative time was significantly longer in the NQ group than in the Q group (199 vs. 168 min, p=0.029). The amount of blood loss, post-operative complications, and duration of hospitalisation were similar between both groups. No mortality was observed. One conversion case was seen in the NQ group. The 3-year recurrence-free survival rate was 86.6% in the NQ group and 88.2% in the Q group, which was not statistically significant (log-rank p=0.966).

conclusionDirect operation by ESSQS-qualified surgeons contributed to a shortened operation time. Under an organised educational environment, almost equivalent safety and oncological outcomes are expected regardless of the surgeon's qualifications.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyNeoplasmsHumansJapanPrognosisPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeColon cancerEndoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification SystemLaparoscopic surgeryProficiencyPropensity score matching

Identifiers

PMID33608034
PMCPMC7893747
OpenAlexW3123462290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.