Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33608027›Full record

Trial reportReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2021

Improved clinical outcomes after non-invasive oocyte selection and Day 3 eSET in ICSI patients.

Inge Van Vaerenbergh, Tom Adriaenssens, Wim Coucke, Lisbet Van Landuyt, Greta Verheyen, Michaël De Brucker, Michel Camus, Peter Platteau, Michel De Vos, Elien Van Hecke and 2 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialValidation Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02962466 naunknown statusnot on this map

Cumulus Cell Messenger Ribonucleic Acid (mRNA) Analysis as Oocyte Quality Marker in the Fertility Lab in a Prospective Multicenter Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitair Ziekenhuis BrusselRan2016 to 2020Enrolled100ConditionsPregnancyArmsCC-Test
NCT03659786 naunknown statusnot on this map

Cumulus Cell Messenger Ribonucleic Acid (mRNA) Analysis as Oocyte Quality Marker in the Fertility Lab in a Prospective Single-center Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitair Ziekenhuis BrusselRan2013 to 2018Enrolled100ConditionsPregnancyArmsCC-Test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Inge Van Vaerenbergh *Follicle Biology Laboratory, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090, Brussels, Belgium. inge.vanvaerenbergh@fertiga.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1597-5631
Tom Adriaenssens *Follicle Biology Laboratory, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Wim CouckeQuality of Laboratories, Sciensano, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.
Lisbet Van LanduytCentre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Greta VerheyenCentre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Michaël De BruckerCentre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Michel CamusCentre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Peter PlatteauCentre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Michel De VosFollicle Biology Laboratory, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Elien Van HeckeFertiga, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
André RosenthalFertiga, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Johan SmitzFollicle Biology Laboratory, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel · BEVrije Universiteit Brussel · BESciensano (Belgium) · BE

Funding

Agentschap Innoveren en Ondernemen IWT/VLAIO Innovation Mandate 130327 and 140568Vrije Universiteit Brussel IOFPOC26
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-invasive oocyte quality scoring, based on cumulus gene expression analysis, in combination with morphology scoring, can increase the clinical pregnancy (CPR) and live birth rates (LBR) in Day 3 eSET (elective single embryo transfer) ICSI patients. This was first investigated in a pilot study and is now confirmed in a large patient cohort of 633 patients. It was investigated whether CPR, LBR and time-to-pregnancy could be improved by analyzing the gene expression profile of three predictive genes in the cumulus cells, compared to patients with morphology-based embryo selection only.

methodsA large interventional, non-randomized, assessor-blinded cohort study with 633 ICSI patients was conducted in a tertiary fertility center. Non-PCOS patients, 22-39 years old, with good ovarian reserve, were stimulated with HP-hMG using a GnRH antagonist protocol and planned for fresh Day 3 eSET. The cumulus cells from individually denuded oocytes were ranked by a lab-developed cumulus cell test: qRT-PCR for three predictive genes (CAMK1D, EFNB2 and SASH1) and two control genes (UBC, B2M). The embryo selected for transfer was highest ranked from the pool of morphologically transferable Day 3 embryos. Patients in the control (n = 520) and experimental arm (n = 113) were compared for clinical pregnancy and live birth, using a weighted generalized linear model, and time-to-pregnancy using Kaplan-Meier curves.

resultsThe CPR was 61% in the experimental arm (n = 113) vs 29% in the control arm (n = 520, p < 0.0001). The LBR in the experimental arm (50%) was significantly higher than in the control arm (27%,p < 0.0001). Time-to-pregnancy was significantly shortened by 3 transfer cycles independent of the number of embryos available on Day 3 (Kaplan-Meier, p < 0.0001). Cumulus cell tested patients < 35 years (n = 65) or ≥ 35 years (n = 48) had a CPR of 62 and 60% respectively (ns). For cumulus cell tested patients with 2, 3-4, or > 4 transferable embryos, the CPR was 66, 52, and 67% (ns) respectively, and thus independent of the number of transferable embryos on Day 3.

conclusionsThis study provides further evidence of the clinical usefulness of the non-invasive cumulus cell test over time in a larger patient cohort.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, NCT03659786 / NCT02962466 (Registered 6Sep2018/11Nov2016, retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Sperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicAdultBelgiumBirth RateCohort StudiesEmbryo TransferFemaleHumansInfertilityLive BirthModels, TheoreticalOocyte RetrievalOocytesPregnancyPregnancy RateSingle-Blind MethodClinical pregnancyCumulus cellsGene expressionLive birthNon-invasiveSingle embryo transfer

Identifiers

PMID33608027
PMCPMC7892761
OpenAlexW3133389886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.