ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2021
Surgical training model and safe implementation of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy in Japan: a technical note.
Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of educational video on performance in robotic simulation training (TAKUMI-1): a randomized controlled trial.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Trial
- Impact of robotic approach on total operating room time and surgical workflow in minimally invasive liver resection (TAKUMI-8).Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Surgical Outcomes of Sequential Robot-Assisted Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery in a Single Operating Room: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of a High-Volume Center in Japan (TAKUMI-6).Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Article
- Quantifying the Viscoelastic Properties of Pancreatic Tissue: A Comparative Study of Human, Porcine and Engineered Hydrogel.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Article
- Outcomes of Robotic Pancreatectomy in the Octogenarian: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.Cancers · 2025Article
- Impact of internal stent placement on late biliary complications after robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Observational
- The implementation of a robotic surgical platform for the treatment of patients with malignant or pre-malignant pancreatic tumors at the University Medical Center Ljubljana.Radiology and oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Robotic distal pancreatectomy using two-surgeon technique (TAKUMI-4): a technical note and initial outcomes.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
- Impact of visceral fat area on surgical difficulty during robotic distal pancreatectomy (TAKUMI-2).Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Surgical protocol of robotic liver resection using a two-surgeon technique (TAKUMI-3): a technical note and initial outcomes.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- The state of roboticGland surgery · 2024Article
- Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy in Portal Annular Pancreas Using a Hanging Maneuver with Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Training efficacy of robotic duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy simulation using silicone models for surgical fellows.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2024Article
- Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Using the Right Posterior Superior Mesenteric Artery Approach.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023Article
- Innovative suture technique for robotic hepaticojejunostomy: double-layer interrupted sutures.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Article
- The influence of procedural volume on short-term outcomes for robotic pancreatoduodenectomy-a cohort study and a learning curve analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Role of the Pfannenstiel Incision in Robotic Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGrowing evidence for the advantages of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) has been demonstrated internationally. However, there has been no structured training program for RPD in Japan. Herein, we present the surgical training model of RPD and a standardized protocol for surgical technique.
methodsThe surgical training model and surgical technique were standardized in order to implement RPD safely, based on the Dutch training system collaborated with the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.
resultsThe surgical training model included various trainings such as basic robotic training, simulation training, biotissue training, and a surgical video review. Furthermore, a standardized protocol on the surgical technique was established to understand the tips, tricks, and pitfalls of RPD.
conclusionsSafe implementation of RPD can be achieved through the completion of a structured training program and learning surgical technique. A nationwide structured training system should be developed to implement the program safely in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.