Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33606943›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of biophysics2021

Analysis of Tandem Repeat Protein Folding Using Nearest-Neighbor Models.

Mark Petersen, Doug Barrick

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of biophysics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Stability and cooperativity in chimeric de novo TIM barrels via quarter swapping.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Protein engineering: status report.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evolution and folding of repeat proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mark PetersenProgram in Molecular Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA.
Doug BarrickT.C. Jenkins Department of Biophysics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA; email: barrick@jhu.edu.

Funding

REPEAT-PROTEINS;STABILITY, FOLDING KINETICS &EVOLUTIONR01GM068462 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BARRICK, DOUGLAS E. · 2005 to 2025
$6.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM068462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cooperativity is a hallmark of protein folding, but the thermodynamic origins of cooperativity are difficult to quantify. Tandem repeat proteins provide a unique experimental system to quantify cooperativity due to their internal symmetry and their tolerance of deletion, extension, and in some cases fragmentation into single repeats. Analysis of repeat proteins of different lengths with nearest-neighbor Ising models provides values for repeat folding ([Formula: see text]) and inter-repeat coupling (Δ

Indexed as

Models, MolecularProtein FoldingTandem Repeat SequencesThermodynamicscooperativityIsing modelprotein foldingrepeat proteinstatistical thermodynamics

Identifiers

PMID33606943
PMCPMC8105288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.