ArticleNursing open2021
Relationship between perceived social support and psychological hardiness with family communication patterns and quality of life of oncology patients.
Article in Nursing open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Examining the role of social support and death anxiety on life expectancy among cancer patients.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
- Mediating role of coping strategies in the relationship between disease management self-efficacy, mental toughness, and quality of life in cardiovascular patients.Discover mental health · 2025Article
- Relationship between big five personality and health literacy in elderly patients with chronic diseases: the mediating roles of family communication and self-efficacy.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Relationship between perceived social support and psychological hardiness with family communication patterns and quality of life of oncology patients.Nursing open · 2021Article
- Predictors of Perceived Family Sense of Coherence in Parents of Children with Cancer.Indian journal of palliative careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between PSS, PH, FCP and QoL of oncology patients.
methodsIn this descriptive-correlational study, 340 oncology patients were selected with convenience sampling method from the hospitals in Tehran 2018-2019. Data were collected using, "PSS," "PH," "FCP" and "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30." Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics using SPSS21 and Amos.
resultsThe direct effect and the total effect of PSS and FCP on QoL were significant (p < .001), but their indirect effect was not significant (p > .05) and the effect of PH on QoL was not significant (p = .96). The Root Mean Squares of Error Approximations (RMSEA), Non-Normed Fit Index (NNFI), Comparative Fit Index (CFI) and Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) were estimated 0.07, 0.97, 0.98 and 0.91, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.