Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33606894›Full record

SynthesisClinical and translational science2021

Mortality, viral clearance, and other clinical outcomes of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Zakariya Kashour, Tarek Kashour, Danielle Gerberi, Imad M Tleyjeh

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical and translational science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. An update on drugs with therapeutic potential for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) treatment.Drug resistance updates : reviews and commentaries in antimicrobial and anticancer chemotherapy · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Zakariya KashourDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Tarek KashourDepartment of Cardiac Sciences, King Fahad Cardiac Center, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh Saudi Arabia.
Danielle GerberiMayo Clinic Libraries, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Imad M TleyjehInfectious Diseases Section, Department of Medical Specialties King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Fahd Medical City · SAKing Saud Medical City · SAUniversity of Alberta · CAWinnMed · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many meta-analyses have been published about the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Most of them included observational studies, and few have assessed HCQ as a prophylaxis or evaluated its safety profile. We searched multiple databases and preprint servers for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed HCQ for the treatment or prevention of COVID-19. We summarized the effect of HCQ on mortality, viral clearance, and other clinical outcomes. Out of 768 papers screened, 21 RCTs with a total of 14,138 patients were included. A total of 9 inpatient and 3 outpatient RCTs assessed mortality in 8596 patients with a pooled risk difference of 0.01 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.00-0.03, I

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentSARS-CoV-2COVID-19HumansHydroxychloroquineRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicViral LoadHydroxychloroquine

Identifiers

PMID33606894
PMCPMC8013604
OpenAlexW3131311414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.