Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33606819›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

A machine learning approach to identify distinct subgroups of veterans at risk for hospitalization or death using administrative and electronic health record data.

Ravi B Parikh, Kristin A Linn, Jiali Yan, Matthew L Maciejewski, Ann-Marie Rosland, Kevin G Volpp, Peter W Groeneveld, Amol S Navathe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Recent Advances in AI and GenAI for Health Informatics.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ravi B ParikhCorporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2692-6306
Kristin A LinnDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Jiali YanDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Matthew L MaciejewskiDurham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Ann-Marie RoslandVA Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Kevin G VolppCorporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Peter W GroeneveldVA Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Amol S NavatheCorporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

Funding

Segmenting High-Need, High-Cost Veterans into Potentially Actionable SubgroupsI21HX002564 · VA · PHILADELPHIA VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI NAVATHE, AMOL S · 2019 to 2020
–
HSRD VA I21 HX002564HSRD VA IK6 HX003157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying individuals at risk for future hospitalization or death has been a major priority of population health management strategies. High-risk individuals are a heterogeneous group, and existing studies describing heterogeneity in high-risk individuals have been limited by data focused on clinical comorbidities and not socioeconomic or behavioral factors. We used machine learning clustering methods and linked comorbidity-based, sociodemographic, and psychobehavioral data to identify subgroups of high-risk Veterans and study long-term outcomes, hypothesizing that factors other than comorbidities would characterize several subgroups. METHODS AND

findingsIn this cross-sectional study, we used data from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse, a national repository of VA administrative claims and electronic health data. To identify high-risk Veterans, we used the Care Assessment Needs (CAN) score, a routinely-used VA model that predicts a patient's percentile risk of hospitalization or death at one year. Our study population consisted of 110,000 Veterans who were randomly sampled from 1,920,436 Veterans with a CAN score≥75th percentile in 2014. We categorized patient-level data into 119 independent variables based on demographics, comorbidities, pharmacy, vital signs, laboratories, and prior utilization. We used a previously validated density-based clustering algorithm to identify 30 subgroups of high-risk Veterans ranging in size from 50 to 2,446 patients. Mean CAN score ranged from 72.4 to 90.3 among subgroups. Two-year mortality ranged from 0.9% to 45.6% and was highest in the home-based care and metastatic cancer subgroups. Mean inpatient days ranged from 1.4 to 30.5 and were highest in the post-surgery and blood loss anemia subgroups. Mean emergency room visits ranged from 1.0 to 4.3 and were highest in the chronic sedative use and polysubstance use with amphetamine predominance subgroups. Five subgroups were distinguished by psychobehavioral factors and four subgroups were distinguished by sociodemographic factors.

conclusionsHigh-risk Veterans are a heterogeneous population consisting of multiple distinct subgroups-many of which are not defined by clinical comorbidities-with distinct utilization and outcome patterns. To our knowledge, this represents the largest application of ML clustering methods to subgroup a high-risk population. Further study is needed to determine whether distinct subgroups may benefit from individualized interventions.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAgedComorbidityCross-Sectional StudiesDatabases, FactualFemaleHospitalizationHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsUnited StatesVeterans

Identifiers

PMID33606819
PMCPMC7894856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.