Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33606790›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2021

Observational study of haloperidol in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Nicolas Hoertel, Marina Sánchez-Rico, Raphaël Vernet, Anne-Sophie Jannot, Antoine Neuraz, Carlos Blanco, Cédric Lemogne, Guillaume Airagnes, Nicolas Paris, Christel Daniel and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Psychotropic drug repurposing for COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Nicolas HoertelDépartement de Psychiatrie, Hôpital Corentin-Celton, Centre Université de Paris, AP-HP, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France.
Marina Sánchez-RicoDépartement de Psychiatrie, Hôpital Corentin-Celton, Centre Université de Paris, AP-HP, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1121-8641
Raphaël VernetBiostatistics and Public Health Department, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Medical Informatics, AP-HP, Centre-Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Anne-Sophie JannotFaculté de Santé, UFR de Médecine, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Antoine NeurazINSERM, UMR_S 1138, Cordeliers Research Center, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Carlos BlancoNational Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.
Cédric LemogneDépartement de Psychiatrie, Hôpital Corentin-Celton, Centre Université de Paris, AP-HP, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3487-4721
Guillaume AiragnesDépartement de Psychiatrie, Hôpital Corentin-Celton, Centre Université de Paris, AP-HP, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France.
Nicolas ParisAP-HP, DSI-WIND, Paris, France.
Christel DanielAP-HP, DSI-WIND, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7938-8156
Alexandre GramfortUniversité Paris-Saclay, Inria, CEA, Palaiseau, France.
Guillaume LemaitreUniversité Paris-Saclay, Inria, CEA, Palaiseau, France.
Mélodie BernauxDirection de la stratégie et de la transformation, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Ali BellamineUnité de Recherche clinique, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, Centre-Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Nathanaël BeekerUnité de Recherche clinique, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, Centre-Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Frédéric LimosinDépartement de Psychiatrie, Hôpital Corentin-Celton, Centre Université de Paris, AP-HP, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France.
AP-HP/Universities/INSERM Covid-19 research collaboration and AP-HP Covid CDR Initiative
Inserm · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FRHôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FRNational Institute on Drug Abuse · USUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversité Paris-Sud · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHaloperidol, a widely used antipsychotic, has been suggested as potentially useful for patients with COVID-19 on the grounds of its in-vitro antiviral effects against SARS-CoV-2, possibly through sigma-1 receptor antagonist effect.

methodsWe examined the associations of haloperidol use with intubation or death and time to discharge home among adult patients hospitalized for COVID-19 at Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) Greater Paris University hospitals. Study baseline was defined as the date of hospital admission. The primary endpoint was a composite of intubation or death and the secondary endpoint was discharge home among survivors in time-to-event analyses. In the primary analyses, we compared these two outcomes between patients receiving and not receiving haloperidol using univariate Cox regression models in matched analytic samples based on patient characteristics and other psychotropic medications. Sensitivity analyses included propensity score analyses with inverse probability weighting and multivariable Cox regression models.

resultsOf 15,121 adult inpatients with a positive COVID-19 PT-PCR test, 39 patients (0.03%) received haloperidol within the first 48 hours of admission. Over a mean follow-up of 13.8 days (SD = 17.9), 2,024 patients (13.4%) had a primary end-point event and 10,179 patients (77.6%) were discharged home at the time of study end on May 1st. The primary endpoint occurred in 9 patients (23.1%) who received haloperidol and 2,015 patients (13.4%) who did not. The secondary endpoint of discharge home occurred in 16 patients (61.5%) who received haloperidol and 9,907 patients (85.8%) who did not. There were no significant associations between haloperidol use and the primary (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.39 to 1.62, p = 0.531) and secondary (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.74 to 2.28, p = 0.355) endpoints. Results were similar in multiple sensitivity analyses.

conclusionFindings from this multicenter observational study suggest that haloperidol use prescribed at a mean dose of 4.5 mg per day (SD = 5.2) for a mean duration of 8.4 days (SD = 7.2) may not be associated with risk of intubation or death, or with time to discharge home, among adult patients hospitalized for COVID-19.

Indexed as

HospitalizationSARS-CoV-2AdolescentAdultAgedAntipsychotic AgentsAntiviral AgentsCOVID-19Disease-Free SurvivalFemaleHaloperidolHumansMaleMiddle AgedReceptors, sigmaSigma-1 ReceptorAntipsychotic AgentsAntiviral AgentsHaloperidolReceptors, sigmaSigma-1 Receptor

Identifiers

PMID33606790
PMCPMC7895415
OpenAlexW3130233332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.