Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33606767›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

The development and validation of a resource consumption score of an emergency department consultation.

Martin Müller, Clyde B Schechter, Wolf E Hautz, Thomas C Sauter, Aristomenis K Exadaktylos, Stephanie Stock, Tanja Birrenbach

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Clinical Presentations of Adolescents Aged 16-18 Years in the Adult Emergency Department.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  12. Floorball Injuries Presenting to a Swiss Adult Emergency Department: A Retrospective Study (2013-2019).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Martin MüllerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Clyde B SchechterDepartment of Family & Social Medicine & Department of Epidemiology Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, United States of America.
Wolf E HautzDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2445-984X
Thomas C SauterDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Aristomenis K ExadaktylosDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Stephanie StockInstitute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Tanja BirrenbachDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3046-0900
University of Bern · CHAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USUniversity Hospital Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency Department (ED) visits and health care costs are increasing globally, but little is known about contributing factors of ED resource consumption. This study aims to analyse and to predict the total ED resource consumption out of the patient and consultation characteristics in order to execute performance analysis and evaluate quality improvements.

methodsCharacteristics of ED visits of a large Swiss university hospital were summarized according to acute patient condition factors (e.g. chief complaint, resuscitation bay use, vital parameter deviations), chronic patient conditions (e.g. age, comorbidities, drug intake), and contextual factors (e.g. night-time admission). Univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were conducted with the total ED resource consumption as the dependent variable.

resultsIn total, 164,729 visits were included in the analysis. Physician resources accounted for the largest proportion (54.8%), followed by radiology (19.2%), and laboratory work-up (16.2%). In the multivariable final model, chief complaint had the highest impact on the total ED resource consumption, followed by resuscitation bay use and admission by ambulance. The impact of age group was small. The multivariable final model was validated (R2 of 0.54) and a scoring system was derived out of the predictors.

conclusionsMore than half of the variation in total ED resource consumption can be predicted by our suggested model in the internal validation, but further studies are needed for external validation. The score developed can be used to calculate benchmarks of an ED and provides leaders in emergency care with a tool that allows them to evaluate resource decisions and to estimate effects of organizational changes.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingEmergency Medical ServicesEmergency Service, HospitalHealth Care CostsHealth Care SurveysHumansLinear ModelsRetrospective StudiesSwitzerlandUniversities

Identifiers

PMID33606767
PMCPMC7894944
OpenAlexW3130919003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.