Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33606729›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2021

Fetal, neonatal, and infant outcomes associated with maternal Zika virus infection during pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Marlos Melo Martins, Antonio José Ledo Alves da Cunha, Jaqueline Rodrigues Robaina, Carlos Eduardo Raymundo, Arnaldo Prata Barbosa, Roberto de Andrade Medronho

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Pathogenesis of viral infections during pregnancy.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marlos Melo MartinsDepartment of Pediatrics, Martagão Gesteira Institute of Childcare and Pediatrics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5511-4764
Antonio José Ledo Alves da CunhaDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3592-1849
Jaqueline Rodrigues RobainaDepartment of Pediatrics, Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Carlos Eduardo RaymundoDepartment of Pediatrics, Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4150-4403
Arnaldo Prata BarbosaDepartment of Pediatrics, Instituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Roberto de Andrade MedronhoDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4073-3930
D’Or Institute for Research and Education · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The occurrence of fetal and neonatal disorders in pregnant women with Zika virus infection in the literature is not consistent. This study aims to estimate the prevalence rate of these disorders in fetuses/neonates of pregnant women with confirmed or probable infection by Zika virus. A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted in November 2020. Cohort studies that contained primary data on the prevalence of unfavorable outcomes in fetuses or neonates of women with confirmed or probable Zika virus infection during pregnancy were included. A total of 21 cohort studies were included, with a total of 35,568 pregnant women. The meta-analysis showed that central nervous system abnormalities had the highest prevalence ratio of 0.06 (95% CI 0.03-0.09). Intracranial calcifications had a prevalence ratio of 0.01 (95% CI 0.01-0.02), and ventriculomegaly 0.01 (95% CI 0.01-0.02). The prevalence ratio of microcephaly was 0.03 (95% CI 0.02-0.05), fetal loss (miscarriage and stillbirth) was 0.04 (95% CI 0.02-0.06), Small for Gestational Age was 0.04 (95% CI 0.00-0,09), Low Birth Weight was 0.05 (95% CI 0.03-0.08) and Prematurity was 0.07 (95% CI 0.04-0.10). The positivity in RT-PCR for ZIKV performed in neonates born to infected mothers during pregnancy was 0.25 (95% CI 0.06-0.44). We also performed the meta-analysis of meta-analysis for microcephaly with the prevalence ratios from other two previously systematic reviews: 0.03 (95% CI 0.00-0.25). Our results contribute to measuring the impact of Zika virus infection during pregnancy on children's health. The continuous knowledge of this magnitude is essential for the implementation development of health initiatives and programs, in addition to promoting disease prevention, especially in the development of a vaccine for Zika virus. PROSPERO protocol registration: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42019125543.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousCohort StudiesFemaleFetal DiseasesFetusHumansHydrocephalusInfantInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornMaleMicrocephalyNervous System MalformationsPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPregnancy Outcome

Identifiers

PMID33606729
PMCPMC7894820
OpenAlexW3131075304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.