Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33606723›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Using touchscreen equipped operant chambers to study animal cognition. Benefits, limitations, and advice.

Benjamin M Seitz, Kelsey McCune, Maggie MacPherson, Luisa Bergeron, Aaron P Blaisdell, Corina J Logan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Biologically inspired warning patterns deter a passerine,Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Benjamin M SeitzUniversity of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8046-7011
Kelsey McCuneUniversity of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0951-0827
Maggie MacPhersonUniversity of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9522-5688
Luisa BergeronUniversity of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
Aaron P BlaisdellUniversity of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Corina J LoganMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5944-906X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Operant chambers are small enclosures used to test animal behavior and cognition. While traditionally reliant on simple technologies for presenting stimuli (e.g., lights and sounds) and recording responses made to basic manipulanda (e.g., levers and buttons), an increasing number of researchers are beginning to use Touchscreen-equipped Operant Chambers (TOCs). These TOCs have obvious advantages, namely by allowing researchers to present a near infinite number of visual stimuli as well as increased flexibility in the types of responses that can be made and recorded. We trained wild-caught adult and juvenile great-tailed grackles (Quiscalus mexicanus) to complete experiments using a TOC. We learned much from these efforts, and outline the advantages and disadvantages of our protocols. Our training data are summarized to quantify the variables that might influence participation and success, and we discuss important modifications to facilitate animal engagement and participation in various tasks. Finally, we provide a "training guide" for creating experiments using PsychoPy, a free and open-source software that was incredibly useful during these endeavors. This article, therefore, should serve as a resource to those interested in switching to or maintaining a TOC, or who similarly wish to use a TOC to test the cognitive abilities of non-model species or wild-caught individuals.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalCognitionConditioning, OperantLearningPasseriformesAnimals

Identifiers

PMID33606723
PMCPMC7894864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.