Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33606675›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2021

Ecological rules for the assembly of microbiome communities.

Katharine Z Coyte, Chitong Rao, Seth Rakoff-Nahoum, Kevin R Foster

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 140 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The island biology of the host microbiome.Trends in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Katharine Z CoyteDivision of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5231-9350
Chitong RaoDivision of Infectious Diseases, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1162-7530
Seth Rakoff-NahoumDivision of Infectious Diseases, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Kevin R FosterDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4687-6633
Boston Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

ROLE OF DIETARY CONSTITUENTS ON GENE EXPRESSION IN INTESTINAL EPITHELIUMP30DK040561 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ALEXANDER A SOUKAS · 1994 to 2026
$31.6M
Positive Selection as a Host Mechanism to Control the MicrobiomeDP2GM136652 · NIGMS · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI RAKOFF-NAHOUM, SETH · 2019 to 2019
$2.7M
Carbohydrate Public Good Interactions in Healthy and Dysbiotic Bacteroidales CommunitiesK08AI130392 · NIAID · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI RAKOFF-NAHOUM, SETH · 2017 to 2021
$905k
NIAID NIH HHS K08 AI130392NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK040561NIGMS NIH HHS DP2 GM136652Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 201341/A/16/ZWellcome Trust 209397/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans and many other hosts establish a diverse community of beneficial microbes anew each generation. The order and identity of incoming symbionts is critical for health, but what determines the success of the assembly process remains poorly understood. Here we develop ecological theory to identify factors important for microbial community assembly. Our method maps out all feasible pathways for the assembly of a given microbiome-with analogies to the mutational maps underlying fitness landscapes in evolutionary biology. Building these "assembly maps" reveals a tradeoff at the heart of the assembly process. Ecological dependencies between members of the microbiota make assembly predictable-and can provide metabolic benefits to the host-but these dependencies may also create barriers to assembly. This effect occurs because interdependent species can fail to establish when each relies on the other to colonize first. We support our predictions with published data from the assembly of the preterm infant microbiota, where we find that ecological dependence is associated with a predictable order of arrival. Our models also suggest that hosts can overcome barriers to assembly via mechanisms that either promote the uptake of multiple symbiont species in one step or feed early colonizers. This predicted importance of host feeding is supported by published data on the impacts of breast milk in the assembly of the human microbiome. We conclude that both microbe to microbe and host to microbe interactions are important for the trajectory of microbiome assembly.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureMicrobiotaHumansInfant, NewbornMilk, HumanModels, TheoreticalSymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID33606675
PMCPMC7946185
OpenAlexW3132789238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.