Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33606655›Full record

Trial reportJMIR mHealth and uHealth2021

Going Remote-Demonstration and Evaluation of Remote Technology Delivery and Usability Assessment With Older Adults: Survey Study.

Jordan R Hill, Addison B Harrington, Philip Adeoye, Noll L Campbell, Richard J Holden

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04121858 (Brain Safe), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04121858 nacompletednot on this map

Brain Safe: Consumer Intervention to Reduce Exposure to Drugs Linked to Alzheimer's Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndiana UniversityRan2019 to 2025Enrolled706ConditionsAlzheimer Disease, DementiaArmsBrain Safe App, Attention Control App
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Telemedicine minimum viable product for post-exposure prophylaxis to biological material in the COVID-19 pandemic.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jordan R HillDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6677-9465
Addison B HarringtonCenter for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8090-7897
Philip AdeoyeCenter for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1017-9131
Noll L CampbellCenter for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8933-9339
Richard J HoldenDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3603-6158

Funding

Brain Safe: Consumer Intervention to Reduce Exposure to Drugs Linked to Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG056926 · NIA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI HOLDEN, RICHARD J · 2019 to 2023
$3.6M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG056926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic necessitated "going remote" with the delivery, support, and assessment of a study intervention targeting older adults enrolled in a clinical trial. While remotely delivering and assessing technology is not new, there are few methods available in the literature that are proven to be effective with diverse populations, and none for older adults specifically. Older adults comprise a diverse population, including in terms of their experience with and access to technology, making this a challenging endeavor.

objectiveOur objective was to remotely deliver and conduct usability testing for a mobile health (mHealth) technology intervention for older adult participants enrolled in a clinical trial of the technology. This paper describes the methodology used, its successes, and its limitations.

methodsWe developed a conceptual model for remote operations, called the Framework for Agile and Remote Operations (FAR Ops), that combined the general requirements for spaceflight operations with Agile project management processes to quickly respond to this challenge. Using this framework, we iteratively created care packages that differed in their contents based on participant needs and were sent to study participants to deliver the study intervention-a medication management app-and assess its usability. Usability data were collected using the System Usability Scale (SUS) and a novel usability questionnaire developed to collect more in-depth data.

resultsIn the first 6 months of the project, we successfully delivered 21 care packages. We successfully designed and deployed a minimum viable product in less than 6 weeks, generally maintained a 2-week sprint cycle, and achieved a 40% to 50% return rate for both usability assessment instruments. We hypothesize that lack of engagement due to the pandemic and our use of asynchronous communication channels contributed to the return rate of usability assessments being lower than desired. We also provide general recommendations for performing remote usability testing with diverse populations based on the results of our work, including implementing screen sharing capabilities when possible, and determining participant preference for phone or email communications.

conclusionsThe FAR Ops model allowed our team to adopt remote operations for our mHealth trial in response to interruptions from the COVID-19 pandemic. This approach can be useful for other research or practice-based projects under similar circumstances or to improve efficiency, cost, effectiveness, and participant diversity in general. In addition to offering a replicable approach, this paper tells the often-untold story of practical challenges faced by mHealth projects and practical strategies used to address them.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04121858; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04121858.

Indexed as

COVID-19Remote ConsultationTechnologyUser-Computer InterfaceAgedHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesagileagingCOVID-19methodsmobile phonemobile usability testingusability inspection

Identifiers

PMID33606655
PMCPMC7935399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.