ArticleAnalytical chemistry2021
Exploring the Impacts of Conformer Selection Methods on Ion Mobility Collision Cross Section Predictions.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conformational Control of Excited-State Properties in Ortho-Linked Triarylamine-Based Donor-Acceptor Conjugates.ChemistryOpen · 2026Article
- Detection of opioid anesthetic compounds via ammonia-doped ion mobility spectrometry.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- IMPACT-4CCS: Integrated Modeling and Prediction Using Ab Initio and Trained Potentials for Collision Cross Sections.Journal of computational chemistry · 2025Article
- Structural Characterization of Dimeric Perfluoroalkyl Carboxylic Acid Using Experimental and Theoretical Ion Mobility Spectrometry Analyses.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2025Article
- Collision Cross Section Prediction Based on Machine Learning.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Similarity Downselection: Finding theMetabolites · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The prediction of structure dependent molecular properties, such as collision cross sections as measured using ion mobility spectrometry, are crucially dependent on the selection of the correct population of molecular conformers. Here, we report an in-depth evaluation of multiple conformation selection techniques, including simple averaging, Boltzmann weighting, lowest energy selection, low energy threshold reductions, and similarity reduction. Generating 50 000 conformers each for 18 molecules, we used the In Silico Chemical Library Engine (ISiCLE) to calculate the collision cross sections for the entire data set. First, we employed Monte Carlo simulations to understand the variability between conformer structures as generated using simulated annealing. Then we employed Monte Carlo simulations to the aforementioned conformer selection techniques applied on the simulated molecular property: the ion mobility collision cross section. Based on our analyses, we found Boltzmann weighting to be a good trade-off between precision and theoretical accuracy. Combining multiple techniques revealed that energy thresholds and root-mean-squared deviation-based similarity reductions can save considerable computational expense while maintaining property prediction accuracy. Molecular dynamic conformer generation tools like AMBER can continue to generate new lowest energy conformers even after tens of thousands of generations, decreasing precision between runs. This reduced precision can be ameliorated and theoretical accuracy increased by running density functional theory geometry optimization on carefully selected conformers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.