Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33606251›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021

Statistical Considerations on NGS Data for Inferring Copy Number Variations.

Jie Chen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jie ChenDivision of Biostatistics and Data Science, Department of Population Health Sciences, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA. jiechen@augusta.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology has revolutionized research in genetics and genomics, resulting in massive NGS data and opening more fronts to answer unresolved issues in genetics. NGS data are usually stored at three levels: image files, sequence tags, and alignment reads. The sizes of these types of data usually range from several hundreds of gigabytes to several terabytes. Biostatisticians and bioinformaticians are typically working with the aligned NGS read count data (hence the last level of NGS data) for data modeling and interpretation.To horn in on the use of NGS technology, researchers utilize it to profile the whole genome to study DNA copy number variations (CNVs) for an individual subject (or patient) as well as groups of subjects (or patients). The resulting aligned NGS read count data are then modeled by proper mathematical and statistical approaches so that the loci of CNVs can be accurately detected. In this book chapter, a summary of most popularly used statistical methods for detecting CNVs using NGS data is given. The goal is to provide readers with a comprehensive resource of available statistical approaches for inferring DNA copy number variations using NGS data.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsGenome, HumanGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansBayesian analysisCNVsInformation criterionLikelihood ratio testNGS readsRead countsRead depthStatistical change point analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.