Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33606226›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021

Cryopreservation of Pooled Sperm Samples.

Jennifer L Matthews, Zoltan M Varga

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jennifer L MatthewsZebrafish International Resource Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.
Zoltan M VargaZebrafish International Resource Center, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA. zoltan@zebrafish.org.

Funding

Zebrafish International Resource Center (ZIRC)P40OD011021 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI Zoltan Marton Varga · 2012 to 2026
$36.0M
Development of Germplasm Resources for Preservation of Aquatic ModelsR24OD010441 · OD · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV AGRICULTURAL CENTER · PI BLACKBURN, HARVEY D., MONROE, WILLIAM · 2012 to 2021
$4.3M
NIH HHS P40 OD011021NIH HHS R24 OD010441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryopreservation of sperm cells is currently the most efficient tool for managing large and small collections of valuable genetic resources. Cryopreservation minimizes expenses for animal and facility maintenance such as personnel, water, power, and space. It extends the time offspring can be produced from individual organisms, reduces the need to maintain live populations, provides flexibility for planning future experiments and research projects, and can prevent catastrophic loss of irreplaceable research lines. In this chapter, we present the sperm collection, dilution, cryopreservation, thawing, and in vitro fertilization procedures used at the Zebrafish International Resource Center (ZIRC).

Indexed as

AnimalsCryopreservationCryoprotective AgentsFertilization in VitroMaleSemen PreservationSpermatozoaSperm MotilityZebrafishCryoprotective AgentsCell densityCell motilityCryopreservationIn vitro fertilizationProtocolQuality assessmentQuality controlZebrafish (Danio rerio)

Identifiers

PMID33606226
PMCPMC8942343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.