Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33606180›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2021

Psychometric properties of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) pediatric item bank peer relationships in the Dutch general population.

Michiel A J Luijten, Raphaële R L van Litsenburg, Caroline B Terwee, Martha A Grootenhuis, Lotte Haverman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Reducing patient burden of PROMs in healthcare through advanced computerized adaptive testing stopping rules.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Patients' and parents' perspective on the implementation of Patient Reported Outcome Measures in pediatric clinical practice using the KLIK PROM portal.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michiel A J LuijtenChild and Adolescent Psychiatry & Psychosocial Care, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam Public Health, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Postbus 22660, 1100 AD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8016-2859
Raphaële R L van LitsenburgPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Caroline B TerweeDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Martha A GrootenhuisPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Lotte HavermanChild and Adolescent Psychiatry & Psychosocial Care, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam Public Health, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Postbus 22660, 1100 AD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. l.haverman@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7849-0562

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to validate the PROMIS Pediatric item bank v2.0 Peer Relationships and compare reliability of the full item bank to its short form, computerized adaptive test (CAT) and the social functioning (SF) subscale of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL™).

methodsChildren aged 8-18 (n = 1327), representative of the Dutch population completed the Peer Relationships item bank. A graded response model (GRM) was fit to the data. Structural validity was assessed by checking item-fit statistics (S-X

resultsIn total, 527 (response rate: 39.7%) children completed the PROMIS v2.0 Peer Relationships item bank (n

conclusionThe pediatric PROMIS Peer Relationships item bank was successfully validated for use within the Dutch population and reference data are now available.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdolescentChildFemaleHumansInformation SystemsMalePeer GroupPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsComputerized adaptive testingHealth-related quality of lifePsychometricsReliabilitySocial functioningValidity

Identifiers

PMID33606180
PMCPMC8233291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.