Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33606105›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

The validity, reliability, and reviewer acceptance of VI-RADS in assessing muscle invasion by bladder cancer: a multicenter prospective study.

Maha Ibrahim Metwally, Nesma Adel Zeed, Enas Mahmoud Hamed, Al Shaimaa Fathi Elshetry, Rabab Mahmoud Elfwakhry, Ahmed M Alaa Eldin, Ahmed Sakr, Sameh Abdelaziz Aly, Walid Mosallam, Yara Mohammed Ahmad Ziada and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. What's next for VI-RADS? Updates and future perspectives from the ACR VI-RADS steering committee.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Maha Ibrahim MetwallyDepartment of Radio-diagnosis, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Nesma Adel ZeedDepartment of Radio-diagnosis, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Enas Mahmoud HamedDepartment of Radio-diagnosis, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Al Shaimaa Fathi ElshetryDepartment of Radio-diagnosis, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Rabab Mahmoud ElfwakhryDepartment of Radio-diagnosis, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Ahmed M Alaa EldinDepartment of Radio-diagnosis, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Ahmed SakrDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Sameh Abdelaziz AlyDepartment of Radio-diagnosis, Faculty of Human Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Egypt.
Walid MosallamDepartment of Radio-diagnosis, Faculty of Human Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
Yara Mohammed Ahmad ZiadaDepartment of Radio-diagnosis, Al-Ahrar Teaching Hospital, Zagazig, Egypt.
Rawda BalataDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Ola A HarbDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Mohammad Abd Alkhalik BashaDepartment of Radio-diagnosis, Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt. Mohammad_basha76@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9075-8020

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess diagnostic validity and reliability of VI-RADS in predicting muscle invasion by bladder cancer (BCa) and evaluate reviewer acceptance of VI-RADS for clinical routine.

methodsA prospective multicenter study enrolled 331 patients with suspected/untreated BCa who underwent preoperative multiparametric MRI examination (mp-MRI) of the urinary bladder. Four experienced radiologists independently evaluated all mp-MRI using VI-RADS. The diagnostic validity of VI-RADS for predicting muscle invasion by BCa was calculated using histopathology of the first transurethral resection bladder tumor (TURBT) and second TURBT as the reference standards. The kappa statistics (κ) were applied to assess the interreader agreement (IRA). Reviewer acceptance was evaluated with questionnaires.

resultsThe risk of muscle invasion in VI-RADS 2, 3, 4, and 5 after the first and second TURBT was 21.8%, 45.8%, 69.6%, and 96.4% and 24.4%, 58.3%, 87%, and 99.2%, respectively. The overall diagnostic validity of VI-RADS was high. The optimal cut-off value for predicting muscle invasion after first TURBT was > VI-RADS 3 (sensitivity = 84.1% and specificity = 92.3%), and after second TURBT was > VI-RADS 2 (sensitivity = 89.9% and specificity = 90.1%). VI-RADS categorization showed a very good IRA (κ = 0.93). Reviewers fully agreed with the statement, "The application of structured reporting of bladder tumor should be encouraged" (score = 20).

conclusionsVI-RADS showed high diagnostic validity and reliability for predicting muscle invasion by BCa, especially VI-RADS 4 and 5. However, VI-RADS 2 and 3 require further modifications to enhance their diagnostic validity. VI-RADS is highly encouraged to be used in daily practice. KEY POINTS: • VI-RADS showed high diagnostic validity and reliability in predicting BCa muscle invasion, especially VI-RADS 4 and 5. • In VI-RADS 2 and 3, we observed a notable percentage of BCa with muscle invasion and this would require further modifications to enhance the diagnostic validity for these scores. • Overall VI-RADS is well-accepted by radiologists who recommend it for daily practice.

Indexed as

Urinary Bladder NeoplasmsCystectomyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMusclesProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsDiffusion magnetic resonance imagingMultiparametric magnetic resonance imagingReproducibility of resultsUrinary bladder neoplasms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.