Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33606104›Full record

ReviewEJNMMI research2021

Clinical results of fibroblast activation protein (FAP) specific PET for non-malignant indications: systematic review.

Paul Windisch, Daniel R Zwahlen, Frederik L Giesel, Eberhard Scholz, Patrick Lugenbiel, Jürgen Debus, Uwe Haberkorn, Sebastian Adeberg

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EJNMMI research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. State-of-the-art of FAPI-PET imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Fibroblast activation protein-targeted PET/CT withEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Trial
  5. The role of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Automated and manual synthesis of [EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2026
    Article
  9. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  10. [RMD open · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP) PET.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The comparative utility of FAPI-based PET radiotracers over [American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Review
  17. IncreasedSkeletal radiology · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. The potential utility of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul WindischDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Brauerstrasse 15, 8400, Winterthur, Switzerland. paul.windisch@ksw.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1040-4888
Daniel R ZwahlenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Brauerstrasse 15, 8400, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Frederik L GieselDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Eberhard ScholzDepartment of Cardiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Patrick LugenbielDepartment of Cardiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jürgen DebusDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Uwe HaberkornDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sebastian AdebergDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
German Cancer Research Center · DEHeidelberg University · DEKantonsspital Winterthur · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSmall molecules targeting fibroblast activation protein (FAP) have emerged as a new group of tracers for positron emission tomography (PET) in 2018. While most of the existing literature has been focussed on the application of FAP-specific PET in various kinds of cancers, some researchers have, both intentionally or unintentionally, used FAP-specific PET in patients with non-cancerous diseases. The purpose of this systematic review is therefore to summarize the available evidence of FAP-specific PET for non-malignant indications.

methodsThe MEDLINE database was searched for studies presenting the clinical use of FAP-specific PET, the records were screened according to PRISMA guidelines and articles containing patients suffering from non-malignant diseases were included.

resultsSixteen studies with 303 patients were included. FAP-specific PET has been used in cardiac imaging, IgG

conclusionWhile publications on FAP-specific PET for non-malignant indications are mostly limited to case reports and incidental findings, the first retrospective and prospective studies present promising results for IgG

Indexed as

FAPFibroblast activation proteinFibroblastsPETPET-CTPositron emission tomography

Identifiers

PMID33606104
PMCPMC7895887
OpenAlexW3129663745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.