Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33606090›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of nutrition2021

Similar ergogenic effect of caffeine on anaerobic performance in men and women athletes.

Beatriz Lara, Juan José Salinero, Verónica Giráldez-Costas, Juan Del Coso

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Beatriz LaraExercise Physiology Laboratory, Camilo José Cela University., C/Castillo de Alarcon, 49. Villafranca del Castillo, 28692, Madrid, Spain. blara@ucjc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5516-4852
Juan José SalineroExercise Physiology Laboratory, Camilo José Cela University., C/Castillo de Alarcon, 49. Villafranca del Castillo, 28692, Madrid, Spain.
Verónica Giráldez-CostasExercise Physiology Laboratory, Camilo José Cela University., C/Castillo de Alarcon, 49. Villafranca del Castillo, 28692, Madrid, Spain.
Juan Del CosoCentre for Sport Studies, Rey Juan Carlos University, Fuenlabrada, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5785-984X
Camilo José Cela University · ESCamilo José Cela University · ESUniversidad Rey Juan Carlos · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCaffeine is widely considered an ergogenic aid to increase anaerobic performance although most of this evidence is supported by investigations with only male samples. To date, it is unknown if the ergogenic effect of caffeine on anaerobic performance is of similar magnitude in men and women athletes. The aim of this study was to determine the magnitude of the ergogenic effect of caffeine on the Wingate test in men and women.

methodsIn a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over experimental trial, ten women athletes and ten men athletes performed a 15-s adapted version of the Wingate test after ingesting 3 mg of caffeine per kg of body mass or a placebo (cellulose).

resultsIn comparison to the performance obtained in the 15-s Wingate test with a placebo, caffeine increased peak power in men (9.9 ± 0.8 vs. 10.1 ± 0.8 W/kg, p < 0.01, d = 0.26) and in women (8.8 ± 0.9 vs. 9.1 ± 0.8 W/kg, p = 0.04, d = 0.30). Caffeine was also effective to increase the mean power in men (8.9 ± 0.7 vs. 9.0 ± 0.7 W/kg, p = 0.01, d = 0.21) and women (8.1 ± 0.7 vs. 8.3 ± 0.7 W/kg, p = 0.01, d = 0.27). The ergogenic effect of caffeine on the 15-s Wingate peak power (2.3 ± 3.2% in men and 3.2 ± 2.8% in women; p = 0.46) and mean power (2.0 ± 1.7% and 2.4 ± 2.3%, respectively; p = 0.93) was of similar magnitude in both sexes.

conclusionAcute ingestion of 3 mg kg

Indexed as

Athletic PerformancePerformance-Enhancing SubstancesAnaerobiosisAthletesCaffeineCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleCaffeinePerformance-Enhancing SubstancesErgogenic aidExerciseGenderNutritionSprint performanceStimulants

Identifiers

PMID33606090
OpenAlexW3133441805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.