ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2021
Surgical Repair of the Genital Hiatus: A Narrative Review.
Review in International urogynecology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surgical Practice Patterns for Concomitant Anterior Colporrhaphy at the Time of Vaginal Apical Repair: An International Survey of FPMRS Specialists.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Perineoplasty, Pain, and Urinary Retention Following Native Tissue Vaginal Prolapse Surgery.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Patient Factors Affecting Physicians' Decision to Add Perineoplasty to Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: A Quantitative Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Current Challenges and Future Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Opinions of Gynecologists About Indication and Technique of Perineoplasty.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Functional Anatomy of Urogenital Hiatus Closure: the Perineal Complex Triad Hypothesis.International urogynecology journal · 2024Article
- Diagnostic Value of Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging (dMRI) of the Pelvic Floor in Genital Prolapses.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Is there an association between 6-month genital hiatus size and 24-month composite prolapse recurrence following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy?International urogynecology journal · 2023Article
- One-year follow-up after standardized perineal reconstruction in women with deficient perineum after vaginal delivery.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2023Article
- Hiatal failure: effects of pregnancy, delivery, and pelvic floor disorders on level III factors.International urogynecology journal · 2023Review
- The Application of a Multidimensional Prediction Model in the Recurrence of Female Pelvic Organ Prolapse after Surgery.Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2022Article
- Significance of Pelvic Floor Hiatus in Female Pelvic Organ Prolapse.Journal of medical ultrasoundReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisAn enlarged genital hiatus (GH) is associated with the development of prolapse and may be associated with prolapse recurrence following surgery; however, there is insufficient evidence to support surgical reduction of the GH as prophylaxis against future prolapse. The objective of this review is (1) to review the association between GH size and pelvic organ prolapse and (2) to discuss the existing literature on surgical procedures that narrow the GH.
methodsA literature search was performed in the PubMed search engine, using the keyword "genital hiatus." Articles were included if they addressed any of the following topics: (1) normative GH values; (2) associations between the GH and prolapse development or recurrence; (3) surgical alteration of the GH; (4) indications, risks or benefits of surgical alteration of the GH.
resultsAn enlarging GH has been observed prior to the development of prolapse. Multiple studies show that an enlarged pre- and/or postoperative GH is associated with an increased risk of recurrent prolapse following prolapse repair surgery. There are limited data on the specific risks of GH alteration related to bowel and sexual function.
conclusionsGH size and prolapse appear to be strongly associated. Because GH size appears to be a risk factor for pelvic organ prolapse, the GH size should be carefully considered at the time of surgery. Surgeons should discuss with their patients the risks and potential benefits of additional procedures designed to reduce GH size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33606054What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.