ArticleThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2021
Prediction of Adult Height by Machine Learning Technique.
Article in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing Pediatric Growth Assessment with Machine Learning: Overcoming Challenges in Early Diagnosis and Monitoring.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Polygenic height prediction for the Han Chinese in Taiwan.NPJ genomic medicine · 2025Article
- Patella height ratios diagnose the same healthy knees differently.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Identifying Key Factors for Predicting the Age at Peak Height Velocity in Preadolescent Team Sports Athletes Using Explainable Machine Learning.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A review of model evaluation metrics for machine learning in genetics and genomics.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- Combined assisted bone age assessment and adult height prediction methods in Chinese girls with early puberty: analysis of three artificial intelligence systems.Pediatric radiology · 2023Article
- Article
- A Novel Method for Adult Height Prediction in Children With Idiopathic Short Stature Derived From a German-Dutch Cohort.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2022Article
- Near-Adult Heights and Adult Height Predictions Using Automated and Conventional Greulich-Pyle Bone Age Determinations in Children with Chronic Endocrine Diseases.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2022Article
- Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Endocrinological Medical Research.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2021Article
- Article
- Artificial intelligence for pediatric height prediction using large-scale longitudinal body composition data.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextPrediction of AH is frequently undertaken in the clinical setting. The commonly used methods are based on the assessment of skeletal maturation. Predictive algorithms generated by machine learning, which can already automatically drive cars and recognize spoken language, are the keys to unlocking data that can precisely inform the pediatrician for real-time decision making.
objectiveTo use machine learning (ML) to predict adult height (AH) based on growth measurements until age 6 years.
methodsGrowth data from 1596 subjects (798 boys) aged 0-20 years from the longitudinal GrowUp 1974 Gothenburg cohort were utilized to train multiple ML regressors. Of these, 100 were used for model comparison, the rest was used for 5-fold cross-validation. The winning model, random forest (RF), was first validated on 684 additional subjects from the 1974 cohort. It was additionally validated using 1890 subjects from the GrowUp 1990 Gothenburg cohort and 145 subjects from the Edinburgh Longitudinal Growth Study cohort.
resultsRF with 51 regression trees produced the most accurate predictions. The best predicting features were sex and height at age 3.4-6.0 years. Observed and predicted AHs were 173.9 ± 8.9 cm and 173.9 ± 7.7 cm, respectively, with prediction average error of -0.4 ± 4.0 cm. Validation of prediction for 684 GrowUp 1974 children showed prediction accuracy r = 0.87 between predicted and observed AH (R2 = 0.75). When validated on the 1990 Gothenburg and Edinburgh cohorts (completely unseen by the learned RF model), the prediction accuracy was r = 0.88 in both cases (R2 = 0.77). AH in short children was overpredicted and AH in tall children was underpredicted. Prediction absolute error correlated negatively with AH (P < .0001).
conclusionWe show successful, validated ML of AH using growth measurements before age 6 years. The most important features for prediction were sex, and height at age 3.4-6.0. Prediction errors result in over- or underestimates of AH for short and tall subjects, respectively. Prediction by ML can be generalized to other cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33606028What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.