Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33606028›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2021

Prediction of Adult Height by Machine Learning Technique.

Michael Shmoish, Alina German, Nurit Devir, Anna Hecht, Gary Butler, Aimon Niklasson, Kerstin Albertsson-Wikland, Ze'ev Hochberg

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Endocrinological Medical Research.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michael ShmoishBioinformatics Knowledge Unit, The Lokey Center, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Alina GermanPediatric Endocrinology, Clalit Health Service, Haifa, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-0934-9420
Nurit DevirComputer Science Department, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Anna HechtComputer Science Department, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Gary ButlerUniversity College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Aimon NiklassonGöteborg Pediatric Growth Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Kerstin Albertsson-WiklandPhysiology/Endocrinology, Institute of Neuroscience & Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ze'ev HochbergThe Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextPrediction of AH is frequently undertaken in the clinical setting. The commonly used methods are based on the assessment of skeletal maturation. Predictive algorithms generated by machine learning, which can already automatically drive cars and recognize spoken language, are the keys to unlocking data that can precisely inform the pediatrician for real-time decision making.

objectiveTo use machine learning (ML) to predict adult height (AH) based on growth measurements until age 6 years.

methodsGrowth data from 1596 subjects (798 boys) aged 0-20 years from the longitudinal GrowUp 1974 Gothenburg cohort were utilized to train multiple ML regressors. Of these, 100 were used for model comparison, the rest was used for 5-fold cross-validation. The winning model, random forest (RF), was first validated on 684 additional subjects from the 1974 cohort. It was additionally validated using 1890 subjects from the GrowUp 1990 Gothenburg cohort and 145 subjects from the Edinburgh Longitudinal Growth Study cohort.

resultsRF with 51 regression trees produced the most accurate predictions. The best predicting features were sex and height at age 3.4-6.0 years. Observed and predicted AHs were 173.9 ± 8.9 cm and 173.9 ± 7.7 cm, respectively, with prediction average error of -0.4 ± 4.0 cm. Validation of prediction for 684 GrowUp 1974 children showed prediction accuracy r = 0.87 between predicted and observed AH (R2 = 0.75). When validated on the 1990 Gothenburg and Edinburgh cohorts (completely unseen by the learned RF model), the prediction accuracy was r = 0.88 in both cases (R2 = 0.77). AH in short children was overpredicted and AH in tall children was underpredicted. Prediction absolute error correlated negatively with AH (P < .0001).

conclusionWe show successful, validated ML of AH using growth measurements before age 6 years. The most important features for prediction were sex, and height at age 3.4-6.0. Prediction errors result in over- or underestimates of AH for short and tall subjects, respectively. Prediction by ML can be generalized to other cohorts.

Indexed as

Body HeightMachine LearningAdultAlgorithmsAnthropometryChildChild, PreschoolDecision Support TechniquesGrowth ChartsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLongitudinal StudiesMalePediatricsPredictive Value of TestsArtificial intelligencechild growthgrowth analysesheight predictionrandom tree

Identifiers

PMID33606028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.