Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33605955›Full record

ArticleLab on a chip2021

An in vitro vascularized micro-tumor model of human colorectal cancer recapitulates in vivo responses to standard-of-care therapy.

Stephanie J Hachey, Silva Movsesyan, Quy H Nguyen, Giselle Burton-Sojo, Ani Tankazyan, Jie Wu, Tuyen Hoang, Da Zhao, Shuxiong Wang, Michaela M Hatch and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lab on a chip, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Stephanie J HacheyDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA. cchughes@uci.edu.
Silva Movsesyan
Quy H Nguyen
Giselle Burton-Sojo
Ani Tankazyan
Jie Wu
Tuyen Hoang
Da Zhao
Shuxiong Wang
Michaela M Hatch
Elizabeth Celaya
Samantha Gomez
George T Chen
Ryan T Davis
Kevin Nee
Nicholas Pervolarakis
Devon A Lawson
Kai Kessenbrock
Abraham P Lee
John Lowengrub
Marian L Waterman
Christopher C W Hughes

Funding

Univ.of Calif., Irvine Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA062203 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Melanie Funes · 1994 to 2026
$57.9M
Shared Resource Core: Single Cell AnalysisU54CA217378 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI LANDER, ARTHUR D, LOWENGRUB, JOHN · 2018 to 2022
$9.7M
CARCINOGENESIST32CA009054 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI EDINGER, AIMEE L, FRUMAN, DAVID ALEXANDER · 1985 to 2025
$8.6M
Linking DDR2 expression, the cancer-associated fibroblast, and angiogenesis in the tumor microenvironmentUH3TR000481 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GEORGE, STEVEN CARL · 2014 to 2016
$2.8M
An integrated in vitro model of perfused tumor and cardiac tissueUH2TR000481 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI GEORGE, STEVEN CARL · 2012 to 2013
$1.6M
(PQD5) Development of in Vitro Vascularized Microtumors for Drug ScreeningR01CA180122 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI HUGHES, CHRISTOPHER C. W. · 2013 to 2016
$1.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UH2 TR000481NCATS NIH HHS UH3 TR000481NCI NIH HHS P30 CA062203NCI NIH HHS R01 CA180122NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009054NCI NIH HHS U54 CA217378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Around 95% of anti-cancer drugs that show promise during preclinical study fail to gain FDA-approval for clinical use. This failure of the preclinical pipeline highlights the need for improved, physiologically-relevant in vitro models that can better serve as reliable drug-screening and disease modeling tools. The vascularized micro-tumor (VMT) is a novel three-dimensional model system (tumor-on-a-chip) that recapitulates the complex human tumor microenvironment, including perfused vasculature, within a transparent microfluidic device, allowing real-time study of drug responses and tumor-stromal interactions. Here we have validated this microphysiological system (MPS) platform for the study of colorectal cancer (CRC), the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths, by showing that gene expression, tumor heterogeneity, and treatment responses in the VMT more closely model CRC tumor clinicopathology than current standard drug screening modalities, including 2-dimensional monolayer culture and 3-dimensional spheroids.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsColorectal NeoplasmsDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansLab-On-A-Chip DevicesTumor MicroenvironmentAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID33605955
PMCPMC8525497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.