Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33605892›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2021

Influenza and Respiratory Virus Surveillance, Vaccine Uptake, and Effectiveness at a Time of Cocirculating COVID-19: Protocol for the English Primary Care Sentinel System for 2020-2021.

Simon de Lusignan, Jamie Lopez Bernal, Rachel Byford, Gayatri Amirthalingam, Filipa Ferreira, Oluwafunmi Akinyemi, Nick Andrews, Helen Campbell, Gavin Dabrera, Alexandra Deeks and 18 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The impact of social and physical distancing measures on COVID-19 activity in England: findings from a multi-tiered surveillance system.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Simon de Lusignan *Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8553-2641
Jamie Lopez Bernal *Public Health England, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1301-5653
Rachel Byford *Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4792-8995
Gayatri Amirthalingam *Public Health England, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2078-0975
Filipa Ferreira *Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7717-8486
Oluwafunmi AkinyemiNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0401-0145
Nick AndrewsPublic Health England, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2069-2684
Helen CampbellPublic Health England, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9840-8917
Gavin DabreraPublic Health England, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4606-5945
Alexandra DeeksNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8895-317X
Alex J ElliotPublic Health England, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6414-3065
Else KrajenbrinkRoyal College of General Practitioners, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6563-9441
Harshana LiyanageNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9738-6349
Dylan McGaghNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6772-2775
Cecilia OkusiNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5575-8527
Vaishnavi ParimalanathanNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0458-9049
Mary RamsayPublic Health England, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7156-7640
Gillian SmithPublic Health England, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4257-0568
Manasa TripathyNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9840-3876
John WilliamsNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6118-0434
William VictorRoyal College of General Practitioners, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3660-6517
Maria ZambonPublic Health England, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8897-7881
Gary HowsamRoyal College of General Practitioners, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6699-5504
Brian David NicholsonNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0661-7362
Victoria Tzortziou BrownRoyal College of General Practitioners, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9819-6395
Christopher C ButlerNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0088-645X
Mark JoyNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4974-3724
F D Richard HobbsNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7976-7172
University of Oxford · GBPublic Health England · GBRoyal College of General Practitioners · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Oxford-Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Research and Surveillance Centre (RSC) and Public Health England (PHE) are commencing their 54th season of collaboration at a time when SARS-CoV-2 infections are likely to be cocirculating with the usual winter infections.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to conduct surveillance of influenza and other monitored respiratory conditions and to report on vaccine uptake and effectiveness using nationally representative surveillance data extracted from primary care computerized medical records systems. We also aim to have general practices collect virology and serology specimens and to participate in trials and other interventional research.

methodsThe RCGP RSC network comprises over 1700 general practices in England and Wales. We will extract pseudonymized data twice weekly and are migrating to a system of daily extracts. First, we will collect pseudonymized, routine, coded clinical data for the surveillance of monitored and unexpected conditions; data on vaccine exposure and adverse events of interest; and data on approved research study outcomes. Second, we will provide dashboards to give general practices feedback about levels of care and data quality, as compared to other network practices. We will focus on collecting data on influenza-like illness, upper and lower respiratory tract infections, and suspected COVID-19. Third, approximately 300 practices will participate in the 2020-2021 virology and serology surveillance; this will include responsive surveillance and long-term follow-up of previous SARS-CoV-2 infections. Fourth, member practices will be able to recruit volunteer patients to trials, including early interventions to improve COVID-19 outcomes and point-of-care testing. Lastly, the legal basis for our surveillance with PHE is Regulation 3 of the Health Service (Control of Patient Information) Regulations 2002; other studies require appropriate ethical approval.

resultsThe RCGP RSC network has tripled in size; there were previously 100 virology practices and 500 practices overall in the network and we now have 322 and 1724, respectively. The Oxford-RCGP Clinical Informatics Digital Hub (ORCHID) secure networks enable the daily analysis of the extended network; currently, 1076 practices are uploaded. We are implementing a central swab distribution system for patients self-swabbing at home in addition to in-practice sampling. We have converted all our primary care coding to Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) coding. Throughout spring and summer 2020, the network has continued to collect specimens in preparation for the winter or for any second wave of COVID-19 cases. We have collected 5404 swabs and detected 623 cases of COVID-19 through extended virological sampling, and 19,341 samples have been collected for serology. This shows our preparedness for the winter season.

conclusionsThe COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with a groundswell of general practices joining our network. It has also created a permissive environment in which we have developed the capacity and capability of the national primary care surveillance systems and our unique public health institute, the RCGP and University of Oxford collaboration.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsCOVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentFemaleHumansInfluenza, HumanMaleMiddle AgedPopulation SurveillancePublic HealthRespiratory Tract InfectionsUnited KingdomVaccinesVaccinescomputerized medical record systemscoronavirus infectionsCOVID-19general practiceinfluenzarecords as topicsentinel surveillanceserologyvirology

Identifiers

PMID33605892
PMCPMC7899204
OpenAlexW3111500785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.