Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33605891›Full record

ReviewJMIR mental health2021

A Perspective on Client-Psychologist Relationships in Videoconferencing Psychotherapy: Literature Review.

Francesco Cataldo, Shanton Chang, Antonette Mendoza, George Buchanan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMIR mental health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Therapeutic Relational Connection in Telehealth: Concept Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Francesco CataldoSchool of Computing and Information Systems, University Of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8630-7681
Shanton ChangSchool of Computing and Information Systems, University Of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2163-3910
Antonette MendozaSchool of Computing and Information Systems, University Of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6903-1169
George BuchananSchool of Computing and Information Systems, University Of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9044-6644

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, people have been encouraged to maintain social distance. Technology helps people schedule meetings as remote videoconferencing sessions rather than face-to-face interactions. Psychologists are in high demand because of an increase in stress as a result of COVID-19, and videoconferencing provides an opportunity for mental health clinicians to treat current and new referrals. However, shifting treatment from face-to-face to videoconferencing is not simple: both psychologists and clients miss in-person information cues, including body language.

objectiveThis review proposes a new theoretical framework to guide the design of future studies examining the impact of a computer as a mediator of psychologist-client relationships and the influence of videoconferencing on the relationship process.

methodsWe conducted a literature review including studies focused on communication and key concepts of the therapeutic relationship and therapeutic alliance.

resultsStudies have reported that clients are generally satisfied with videoconference therapy in terms of the relationship with their therapists and the establishment of the therapeutic alliance. Conversely, studies indicate that psychologists continue to highlight difficulties in establishing the same quality of therapeutic relationship and therapeutic alliance. The contrasting experiences might underlie the differences in the type of emotional and cognitive work required by both actors in any therapy session; furthermore, the computer seems to take part in their interaction not only as a vehicle to transmit messages but also as an active part of the communication. A new model of interaction and relationship is proposed, taking into account the presence of the computer, along with further hypotheses.

conclusionsIt is important to consider the computer as having an active role in the client-psychologist relationship; thus, it is a third party to the communication that either assists or interferes with the interaction between psychologists and clients.

Indexed as

client-psychologist relationshipsmobile phoneprofessional-patient relationspsychotherapytelehealththerapeutic alliancevideoconference

Identifiers

PMID33605891
PMCPMC7935652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.