Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33605888›Full record

ArticleJMIR cardio2021

Predicting Cardiovascular Risk Using Social Media Data: Performance Evaluation of Machine-Learning Models.

Anietie U Andy, Sharath C Guntuku, Srinath Adusumalli, David A Asch, Peter W Groeneveld, Lyle H Ungar, Raina M Merchant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cardio, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Digital phenotyping and ASCVD risk: An exploratory cross-sectional analysis using online behavioral data.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anietie U AndyPenn Medicine Center for Digital Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7043-3042
Sharath C GuntukuPenn Medicine Center for Digital Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2929-0035
Srinath AdusumalliPenn Medicine Center for Health Care Innovation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0341-1836
David A AschPenn Medicine Center for Health Care Innovation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7970-286X
Peter W GroeneveldCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7374-4292
Lyle H UngarPenn Medicine Center for Digital Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2047-1443
Raina M MerchantPenn Medicine Center for Digital Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9801-6881

Funding

Digital Phenotyping and Cardiovascular HealthR01HL141844 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MERCHANT, RAINA · 2019 to 2022
$3.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL141844
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) predictive models have limitations; thus, efforts are underway to improve the discriminatory power of ASCVD models.

objectiveWe sought to evaluate the discriminatory power of social media posts to predict the 10-year risk for ASCVD as compared to that of pooled cohort risk equations (PCEs).

methodsWe consented patients receiving care in an urban academic emergency department to share access to their Facebook posts and electronic medical records (EMRs). We retrieved Facebook status updates up to 5 years prior to study enrollment for all consenting patients. We identified patients (N=181) without a prior history of coronary heart disease, an ASCVD score in their EMR, and more than 200 words in their Facebook posts. Using Facebook posts from these patients, we applied a machine-learning model to predict 10-year ASCVD risk scores. Using a machine-learning model and a psycholinguistic dictionary, Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count, we evaluated if language from posts alone could predict differences in risk scores and the association of certain words with risk categories, respectively.

resultsThe machine-learning model predicted the 10-year ASCVD risk scores for the categories <5%, 5%-7.4%, 7.5%-9.9%, and ≥10% with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.78, 0.57, 0.72, and 0.61, respectively. The machine-learning model distinguished between low risk (<10%) and high risk (>10%) with an AUC of 0.69. Additionally, the machine-learning model predicted the ASCVD risk score with Pearson r=0.26. Using Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count, patients with higher ASCVD scores were more likely to use words associated with sadness (r=0.32).

conclusionsLanguage used on social media can provide insights about an individual's ASCVD risk and inform approaches to risk modification.

Indexed as

ASCVDatheroscleroticcardiovascular diseasemachine learningnatural language processingsocial mediasocial media language

Identifiers

PMID33605888
PMCPMC8411430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.