Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33605707›Full record

ArticleThe journal of trauma and acute care surgery2021

Risk factors for abdominal surgical site infection after exploratory laparotomy among combat casualties.

Joseph D Bozzay, Patrick F Walker, David W Schechtman, Faraz Shaikh, Laveta Stewart, M Leigh Carson, David R Tribble, Carlos J Rodriguez, Matthew J Bradley, Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program Trauma Infectious Disease Outcomes Study Group

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joseph D BozzayFrom the Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (J.D.B., P.F.W., M.J.B.), Bethesda, Maryland; Brooke Army Medical Center (D.W.S.), JBSA Fort Sam Houston, Texas; Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics (D.R.T.), Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland; Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc. (F.S., L.S., M.L.C.), Bethesda, Maryland; John Peter Smith Hospital (C.J.R.), Fort Worth, Texas, Bethesda, Maryland.
Patrick F Walker
David W Schechtman
Faraz Shaikh
Laveta Stewart
M Leigh Carson
David R Tribble
Carlos J Rodriguez
Matthew J Bradley
Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program Trauma Infectious Disease Outcomes Study Group
Henry M. Jackson Foundation · US

Funding

DATA CENTER FOR EPIDEMIOLOGIC INVESTIGATIONS OF HIVN01AI005072 · NIAID · NEW ENGLAND RESEARCH INSTITUTES, INC. · PI MCKINLAY, SONJA M · 1990 to 1994
–
NIAID NIH HHS Y01 AI005072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical site infections (SSIs) are well-recognized complications after exploratory laparotomy for abdominal trauma; however, little is known about SSI development after exploration for battlefield abdominal trauma. We examined SSI risk factors after exploratory laparotomy among combat casualties.

methodsMilitary personnel with combat injuries sustained in Iraq and Afghanistan (June 2009 to May 2014) who underwent laparotomy and were evacuated to participating US military hospitals were included. Log-binominal regression was used to identify SSI risk factors.

resultsOf 4,304 combat casualties, 341 patients underwent a total of 1,053 laparotomies. Abdominal SSIs were diagnosed in 49 patients (14.4%): 8% with organ space SSI, 4% with deep incisional SSI, and 4% with superficial SSIs (4 patients had multiple SSIs). Patients with SSIs had more colorectal (p < 0.001), small bowel (p = 0.010), duodenum (p = 0.006), pancreas (p = 0.032), and abdominal vascular injuries (p = 0.040), as well as prolonged open abdomen (p = 0.004) and more infections diagnosed before the SSI (or final exploratory laparotomy) versus non-SSI patients (p < 0.001). Sustaining colorectal injuries (risk ratio [RR], 3.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58-6.45), duodenum injuries (RR, 6.71; 95% CI, 1.73-25.58), and being diagnosed with prior infections (RR, 10.34; 95% CI, 5.05-21.10) were independently associated with any SSI development. For either organ space or deep incisional SSIs, non-intra-abdominal infections, fecal diversion, and duodenum injuries were independently associated, while being injured via an improvised explosive device was associated with reduced likelihood compared with penetrating nonblast (e.g., gunshot wounds) injuries. Non-intra-abdominal infections and hypotension were independently associated with organ space SSIs development alone, while sustaining blast injuries were associated with reduced likelihood.

conclusionDespite severity of injuries and the battlefield environment, the combat casualty laparotomy SSI rate is relatively low at 14%, with similar risk factors and rates reported following severe civilian trauma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiological, level III.

Indexed as

Abdominal InjuriesAdultAfghan Campaign 2001-FemaleHumansInjury Severity ScoreIraq War, 2003-2011LaparotomyMaleRegistriesRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSurgical Wound InfectionUnited StatesWar-Related InjuriesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33605707
PMCPMC8324514
OpenAlexW3131020573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.