Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33605705›Full record

ArticleThe journal of trauma and acute care surgery2021

Variation in neurosurgical intervention for severe traumatic brain injury: The challenge of measuring quality in trauma center verification.

Evelyn I Truong, Samuel P Stanley, Belinda S DeMario, Esther S Tseng, John J Como, Vanessa P Ho, Michael L Kelly

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Utility of intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with traumatic brain injuries: a propensity score matching analysis of TQIP data.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Evelyn I TruongFrom the Department of Surgery (E.I.T., S.P.S., B.S.D., E.S.T., J.J.C., V.P.H.) MetroHealth Medical Center; Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences (V.P.H.), Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine; Department of Neurological Surgery, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (M.L.K.).
Samuel P Stanley
Belinda S DeMario
Esther S Tseng
John J Como
Vanessa P Ho
Michael L Kelly
Neurological Surgery · USMetroHealth · USCase Western Reserve University · US

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002547 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI DWEIK, RAED A. · 2018 to 2022
$7.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002547
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntracranial pressure monitor (ICPm) procedure rates are a quality metric for American College of Surgeons trauma center verification. However, ICPm procedure rates may not accurately reflect the quality of care in TBI. We hypothesized that ICPm and craniotomy/craniectomy procedure rates for severe TBI vary across the United States by geography and institution.

methodsWe identified all patients with a severe traumatic brain injury (head Abbreviated Injury Scale, ≥3) from the 2016 Trauma Quality Improvement Program data set. Patients who received surgical decompression or ICPm were identified via International Classification of Diseases codes. Hospital factors included neurosurgeon group size, geographic region, teaching status, and trauma center level. Two multiple logistic regression models were performed identifying factors associated with (1) craniotomy with or without ICPm or (2) ICPm alone. Data are presented as medians (interquartile range) and odds ratios (ORs) (95% confidence interval).

resultsWe identified 75,690 patients (66.4% male; age, 59 [36-77] years) with a median Injury Severity Score of 17 (11-25). Overall, 6.1% had surgical decompression, and 4.8% had ICPm placement. Logistic regression analysis showed that region of the country was significantly associated with procedure type: hospitals in the West were more likely to use ICPm (OR, 1.34 [1.20-1.50]), while Northeastern (OR, 0.80 [0.72-0.89]), Southern (OR, 0.84 [0.78-0.92]), and Western (OR, 0.88 [0.80-0.96]) hospitals were less likely to perform surgical decompression. Hospitals with small neurosurgeon groups (<3) were more likely to perform surgical intervention. Community hospitals are associated with higher odds of surgical decompression but lower odds of ICPm placement.

conclusionBoth geographic differences and hospital characteristics are independent predictors for surgical intervention in severe traumatic brain injury. This suggests that nonpatient factors drive procedural decisions, indicating that ICPm rate is not an ideal quality metric for American College of Surgeons trauma center verification. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiological, level III; Care management/Therapeutic level III.

Indexed as

Decompression, SurgicalIntraoperative Neurophysiological MonitoringAdultAgedBrain Injuries, TraumaticCraniotomyFemaleHospital MortalityHospitals, CommunityHumansInjury Severity ScoreIntracranial PressureLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID33605705
PMCPMC8505004
OpenAlexW3130799623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.