ArticleClinical and translational gastroenterology2021
Validation of the "Six-and-Twelve" Prognostic Score in Transarterial Chemoembolization-Treated Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients.
Article in Clinical and translational gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decision-Making Scoring System for the Repetition of Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization in Patients With Inoperable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2022Trial
- Development of a longitudinal predictive model for hepatocellular carcinoma occurrence in patients with chronic hepatitis B.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Discordance between vibration controlled-transient elastography and ultrasound in cirrhosis assessment: prognostic implications for liver-related events in patients with chronic hepatitis B.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A nationwide population-based cross-sectional time series study of hospitalized chronic liver disease burden in Thailand from 2017 to 2022.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Explainable machine learning model for predicting the transarterial chemoembolization response and subtypes of hepatocellular carcinoma patients.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Enhancing ultrasonographic detection of hepatocellular carcinoma with artificial intelligence: current applications, challenges and future directions.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Comparative performance of the GAAD and ASAP scores in predicting early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma.Gastroenterology report · 2025Article
- Refining Intra-Arterial Therapy Selection for Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Deep Learning Approach Based on Covariate Interaction Analysis.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2025Article
- Current and new strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance.Gastroenterology report · 2025Review
- Clinical Utility of the aMAP Score for Predicting Hepatocellular Carcinoma Development in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Evaluation of models to predict prognosis in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with TACE combined with apatinib.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Health-related quality of life in Thai patients with chronic hepatitis B.Gastroenterology report · 2024Article
- "Six-and-Twelve" Prognostic Score in Transarterial Chemoembolization-Treated Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients.Cureus · 2023Article
- Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease-related hepatocellular carcinoma.Journal of liver cancer · 2023Review
- FAIL-T (AFP, AST, tumor sIze, ALT, and Tumor number): a model to predict intermediate-stage HCC patients who are not good candidates for TACE.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Tumor Burden in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Transarterial Chemoembolization: Head-to-Head Comparison of Current Scoring Systems.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- The combination of sarcopenia and biochemical factors can predict the survival of hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving transarterial chemoembolization.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- ABO Blood Group Differentials on Survival in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated with Chemoembolization.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe "six-and-twelve" prognostic score was proposed recently to predict survival rate in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). However, it has not been validated externally. We validated this score and previous prognostic scores in Thai HCC patients treated with TACE.
methodsWe identified all HCC patients who underwent TACE between January 2007 and December 2018 at our hospital. The inclusion criteria were treatment-naive, unresectable HCC BCLC-A and BCLC-B; if cirrhosis was present, Child-Pugh score ≤7; and baseline performance status 0-1.
resultsOf 716 HCC patients undergoing TACE, 281 (mean age, 61.1 years; 73.0% men, 92.2% with cirrhosis) were eligible. Approximately half of the patients had hepatitis B virus. Median overall survival was 20.3 (95% confidence interval, 16.4-26.3) months. By stratifying with the "six-and-twelve" score (≤6, >6-12, >12), median (95% confidence interval) overall survival was 35.1 (26.4-53.0), 16.0 (11.6-22.6), and 7.6 (5.4-14.9) months, respectively. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) predicting death at 1, 2, and 3 years for the "six-and-twelve" score were 0.714, 0.700, and 0.688, respectively. Compared with the other currently available scores, the AUROC predicting death at 1 year for the "six-and-twelve" score was the most predictive and better than other models except the up-to-seven model. DISCUSSION: Our study confirms the value of the "six-and-twelve" score to predict survival rate of unresectable HCC treated with TACE. However, in our validation cohort, AUROC of the "six-and-twelve" score was slightly lower than that of the original Chinese cohort (0.73).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.