Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33605553›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2021

The accuracy of HPV genotyping in isolation and in combination with CD4 and HIV viral load for the identification of HIV-infected women at risk for developing cervical cancer.

Chandrika J Piyathilake, Suguna Badiga, Greer A Burkholder, Shuko Harada, James L Raper

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chandrika J PiyathilakeDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, The University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3857-7035
Suguna BadigaDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, The University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3342-2600
Greer A BurkholderDepartment of Medicine/Division of Infectious Diseases, The University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA.
Shuko HaradaDepartment of Pathology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA.
James L RaperDepartment of Medicine/Division of Infectious Diseases, The University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman papillomavirus (HPV) genotype testing has limited utility to identify human immunodeficiency virus-infected (HIV+) women's risk for developing cervical cancer (CC) due to high positivity rate of high-risk (HR) HPVs. We investigated the accuracy of HPV testing in isolation/in combination with CD4 and HIV viral load (VL) to identify HIV+ women at risk for developing CC.

methodsStudy consisted of 344 HIV+ women on combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), tested for cervical cytology/HPV using the Cobas test and had data on absolute CD4 count and VL measurements. We calculated the positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of HPV testing, pre-, post-cART, and current CD4 and VL in isolation and in combinations to identify those with or free of higher than atypical squamous cells of unknown significance (ASCUS+) or low-grade intraepithelial lesions (LSIL+).

resultsHPV test in combination with pre-/post-cART or current CD4 counts and VL had higher PPVs compared to HPV test alone for identifying ASCUS+ or LSIL+. PPV of HPV-CD4 combinations yielded higher PPVs compared to HPV-VL combinations. The NPVs with pre-, post-cART, or current CD4 count and VL in isolation or in combinations were comparable to that of HPV test alone.

conclusionsOur results provide a more accurate tool for managing HIV+ women by combining Cobas HPV with CD4 and VL, especially those who had an undesirable pre-cART CD4 and VL status. Our results also indicate the usefulness of CD4 and VL measurements to identify those at lower risk in the absence of HPV testing.

Indexed as

GenotypeViral LoadAnti-Retroviral AgentsAtypical Squamous Cells of the CervixCarcinoma in SituCD4 Lymphocyte CountCell CountDNA, ViralDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMiddle AgedPapillomaviridaePredictive Value of TestsRisk AssessmentAnti-Retroviral AgentsDNA, ViralCD4cervical cancercervical cytologyHPVNPVPPVVL

Identifiers

PMID33605553
PMCPMC7940247
OpenAlexW3133409502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.