Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33605383›Full record

ArticleRevista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical2021

Feasibility of very short-term forecast models for COVID-19 hospital-based surveillance.

Edson Zangiacomi Martinez, Afonso Dinis Costa Passos, Antônio Fernando Cinto, Andreia Cássia Escarso, Rosane Aparecida Monteiro, Jorgete Maria E Silva, Fernando Bellissimo-Rodrigues, Davi Casale Aragon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Edson Zangiacomi MartinezUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0949-3222
Afonso Dinis Costa PassosUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.
Antônio Fernando CintoUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Núcleo de Vigilância Epidemiológica Hospitalar, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.
Andreia Cássia EscarsoUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Núcleo de Vigilância Epidemiológica Hospitalar, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.
Rosane Aparecida MonteiroUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.
Jorgete Maria E SilvaUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Núcleo de Vigilância Epidemiológica Hospitalar, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.
Fernando Bellissimo-RodriguesUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.
Davi Casale AragonUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe evaluated the performance of Bayesian vector autoregressive (BVAR) and Holt's models to forecast the weekly COVID-19 reported cases in six units of a large hospital.

methodsCases reported from epidemiologic weeks (EW) 12-37 were selected as the training period, and from EW 38-41 as the test period.

resultsThe models performed well in forecasting cases within one or two weeks following the end of the time-series, but forecasts for a more distant period were inaccurate.

conclusionsBoth models offered reasonable performance in very short-term forecasts for confirmed cases of COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19Bayes TheoremFeasibility StudiesForecastingHospitalsHumansModels, TheoreticalSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33605383
PMCPMC7891562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.