Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33605366›Full record

SynthesisRevista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999)

Anger and substance abuse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Helen V Laitano, Amanda Ely, Anne O Sordi, Felipe B Schuch, Flavio Pechansky, Thiago Hartmann, Juliana B Hilgert, Eliana M Wendland, Lisia Von Dimen, Juliana N Scherer and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Revista brasileira de psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Helen V LaitanoCentro de Pesquisa em Álcool e Drogas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3782-8488
Amanda ElyCentro de Pesquisa em Álcool e Drogas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Anne O SordiCentro de Pesquisa em Álcool e Drogas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Felipe B SchuchDepartamento de Métodos e Técnicas Desportivas, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5190-4515
Flavio PechanskyCentro de Pesquisa em Álcool e Drogas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Thiago HartmannCentro de Pesquisa em Álcool e Drogas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Juliana B HilgertCentro de Pesquisa em Álcool e Drogas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Eliana M WendlandUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Lisia Von DimenCentro de Pesquisa em Álcool e Drogas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Juliana N SchererCentro de Pesquisa em Álcool e Drogas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Alessandra Mendes CalixtoCentro de Pesquisa em Álcool e Drogas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Joana C M NarvaezUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Felipe OrnellCentro de Pesquisa em Álcool e Drogas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Félix H P KesslerCentro de Pesquisa em Álcool e Drogas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7059-2564
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre · BRUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveConduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate levels of anger among substance users compared to non-user controls and to analyze the possible association between anger and psychoactive substance use (PSU).

methodsThe procedures of this review followed the Meta-Analyzes of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIREME, PsycINFO) were searched.

resultsTwelve studies were included in the meta-analysis; 10 used the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI) anger trait subscale and two used the Buss-Perry-Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ) anger subscale. The sample included 2,294 users of psychoactive substances and 2,143 non-users, all male. The mean difference in anger scale scores between users and non-users was 2.151 (95%CI 1.166-3.134, p ≤ 0.00, inconsistency index [I2] = 98.83) standard deviations. Age and abstinence duration did not moderate the difference in anger between substance users and non-users.

conclusionUsers of psychoactive substances had elevated anger scores compared to non-users, which represents a high risk of relapse. It is suggested that PSU treatment programs include intensive anger management modules, focusing on factors such as dealing with daily stressors, family conflicts, frustrations, and problems.

Indexed as

AngerSubstance-Related DisordersAggressionHumansMalePersonality InventorySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID33605366
PMCPMC8827371
OpenAlexW3133165791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.