ArticleACS nano2021
Nanoporous Cubic Silicon Carbide Photoanodes for Enhanced Solar Water Splitting.
Article in ACS nano, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conversion of Rice Husk into Silicon Carbide Nanowires for Photocatalytic and Electrocatalytic Applications.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Upconversion-Assisted Solar-Driven Hydrogen Evolution in β-SiC via Synergistic Upconversion-Polydopamine Integration and Thermoelectric Activation.ChemSusChem · 2026Article
- Silicon Carbide Photonic Crystal Photoelectrode.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Aging Ni(OH)ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024Article
- Interface-Engineered Ni-Coated CdTe Heterojunction Photocathode for Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Hydrogen Evolution.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cubic silicon carbide (3C-SiC) is a promising photoelectrode material for solar water splitting due to its relatively small band gap (2.36 eV) and its ideal energy band positions that straddle the water redox potentials. However, despite various coupled oxygen-evolution-reaction (OER) cocatalysts, it commonly exhibits a much smaller photocurrent (<∼1 mA cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.