ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2021
Accelerated radial echo-planar spectroscopic imaging using golden angle view-ordering and compressed-sensing reconstruction with total variation regularization.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-Shot 2D Radial Echo Planar Imaging for Functional MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Exploring in vivo human brain metabolism at 10.5 T: Initial insights from MR spectroscopic imaging.NeuroImage · 2025Article
- ECCENTRIC: A fast and unrestrained approach for high-resolution in vivo metabolic imaging at ultra-high field MR.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Single-shot diffusion trace spectroscopic imaging using radial echo planar trajectories.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo implement a novel, accelerated, 2D radial echo-planar spectroscopic imaging (REPSI) sequence using undersampled radial k-space trajectories and compressed-sensing reconstruction, and to compare results with those from an undersampled Cartesian spectroscopic sequence.
methodsThe REPSI sequence was implemented using golden-angle view-ordering on a 3T MRI scanner. Radial and Cartesian echo-planar spectroscopic imaging (EPSI) data were acquired at six acceleration factors, each with time-equivalent scan durations, and reconstructed using compressed sensing with total variation regularization. Results from prospectively and retrospectively undersampled phantom and in vivo brain data were compared over estimated concentrations and Cramer-Rao lower-bound values, normalized RMS errors of reconstructed metabolite maps, and percent absolute differences between fully sampled and reconstructed spectroscopic images.
resultsThe REPSI method with compressed sensing is able to tolerate greater reductions in scan time compared with EPSI. The reconstruction and quantitation metrics (i.e., spectral normalized RMS error maps, metabolite map normalized RMS error values [e.g., for total N-acetyl asparate, REPSI = 9.4% vs EPSI = 16.3%; acceleration factor = 2.5], percent absolute difference maps, and concentration and Cramer-Rao lower-bound estimates) showed that accelerated REPSI can reduce the scan time by a factor of 2.5 while retaining image and quantitation quality.
conclusionAccelerated MRSI using undersampled radial echo-planar acquisitions provides greater reconstruction accuracy and more reliable quantitation for a range of acceleration factors compared with time-equivalent compressed-sensing reconstructions of undersampled Cartesian EPSI. Compared to the Cartesian approach, radial undersampling with compressed sensing could help reduce 2D spectroscopic imaging acquisition time, and offers a better trade-off between imaging speed and quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.