Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33604919›Full record

ArticleGenetic epidemiology2021

Variant-set association test for generalized linear mixed model.

Xiang Zhan, Kalins Banerjee, Jun Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiang ZhanDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9650-143X
Kalins BanerjeeDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jun ChenDivision of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

Novel statistical methods for controlled variable selection of microbiome dataR21AI144765 · NIAID · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI CHINCHILLI, VERNON M · 2020 to 2021
$412k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI144765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in high-throughput biotechnologies have culminated in a wide range of omics (such as genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics, and metagenomics) studies, and increasing evidence in these studies indicates that the biological architecture of complex traits involves a large number of omics variants each with minor effects but collectively accounting for the full phenotypic variability. Thus, a major challenge in many "ome-wide" association analyses is to achieve adequate statistical power to identify multiple variants of small effect sizes, which is notoriously difficult for studies with relatively small-sample sizes. A small-sample adjustment incorporated in the kernel machine regression framework was proposed to solve this for association studies under various settings. However, such an adjustment in the generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) framework, which accounts for both sample relatedness and non-Gaussian outcomes, has not yet been attempted. In this study, we fill this gap by extending small-sample adjustment in kernel machine association test to GLMM. We propose a new Variant-Set Association Test (VSAT), a powerful and efficient analysis tool in GLMM, to examine the association between a set of omics variants and correlated phenotypes. The usefulness of VSAT is demonstrated using both numerical simulation studies and applications to data collected from multiple association studies. The software for implementing the proposed method in R is available at https://www.github.com/jchen1981/SSKAT.

Indexed as

GenomicsModels, GeneticComputer SimulationHumansLinear ModelsSample Sizegeneralized linear mixed modelkernel machine regressionomics variantssmall samplevariant-set association test

Identifiers

PMID33604919
PMCPMC8137547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.