Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33604850›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021

Creation of a Bioengineered Ovary: Isolation of Female Germline Stem Cells for the Repopulation of a Decellularized Ovarian Bioscaffold.

Georgia Pennarossa, Matteo Ghiringhelli, Fulvio Gandolfi, Tiziana A L Brevini

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
56.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Decellularized testicular bio-scaffolds driveFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Current Advances in 3D Tissue and Organ Reconstruction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Georgia PennarossaLaboratory of Biomedical Embryology, Department of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety and Center for Stem Cell Research, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy. georgia.pennarossa@unimi.it.
Matteo GhiringhelliTechnion- Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Fulvio GandolfiLaboratory of Biomedical Embryology, Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences-Production, Landscape, Agroenergy, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Tiziana A L BreviniLaboratory of Biomedical Embryology, Department of Health, Animal Science and Food Safety and Center for Stem Cell Research, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
University of Milan · ITTechnion – Israel Institute of Technology · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian failure is the most common cause of infertility and affects about 1% of young women. One innovative strategy to restore ovarian function may be represented by the development of a bioprosthetic ovary, obtained through the combination of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.We here describe the two main steps required for bioengineering the ovary and for its ex vivo functional reassembling. The first step aims at producing a 3D bioscaffold, which mimics the natural ovarian milieu in vitro. This is obtained with a whole organ decellularization technique that allows the maintenance of microarchitecture and biological signals of the original tissue. The second step involves the use of magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) to isolate purified female germline stem cells (FGSCs). These cells are able to differentiate in ovarian adult mature cells, when subjected to specific stimuli, and can be used them to repopulate ovarian decellularized bioscaffolds. The combination of the two techniques represents a powerful tool for in vitro recreation of a bioengineered ovary that may constitute a promising solution for hormone and fertility function restoring. In addition, the procedures here described allow for the creation of a suitable 3D platform with useful applications both in toxicological and transplantation studies.

Indexed as

AnimalsBioengineeringBiomedical EngineeringCell Culture TechniquesExtracellular MatrixFemaleFertilityHumansOogonial Stem CellsOrganoidsOvaryRegenerative MedicineSwineTissue EngineeringTissue Scaffolds3D bioscaffoldBioprosthetic ovaryExtracellular matrixFemale germline stem cellsOvary bioengineering and repopulationWhole-ovary decellularization

Identifiers

PMID33604850
OpenAlexW3130909703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.