Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33604845›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021

A Simplified Method for Three-Dimensional (3D) Porcine Preantral Follicles Culture Utilizing Hydrophobic Microbioreactors.

Malgorzata Duda, Lucia Gizler, Gabriela Gorczyca

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Malgorzata DudaDepartment of Endocrinology, Institute of Zoology and Biomedical Research, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Kraków, Poland. maja.duda@uj.edu.pl.
Lucia GizlerDepartment of Endocrinology, Institute of Zoology and Biomedical Research, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Kraków, Poland.
Gabriela GorczycaDepartment of Endocrinology, Institute of Zoology and Biomedical Research, Faculty of Biology, Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Kraków, Poland.
Jagiellonian University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The technological revolution in reproductive biology that started with artificial insemination procedures and embryo transfer led to the development of assisted reproduction techniques such as in vitro fertilization or even cloning of domestic animals by nuclear transfer from somatic cells. Currently, procedures of isolated immature ovarian follicles in vitro culture are becoming the prominent technology aimed to preserve or restore fertility especially of young oncological patients or those at risk of premature ovarian failure.Here, we describe a protocol that can be applied for in vitro growth of porcine, preantral ovarian follicles in three-dimensional (3D) culture conditions. After enzymatic isolation from the ovarian cortex, preantral follicles are suspended in a drop of medium and enclosed with fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP) powder particles (microbioreactors). Such microbioreactors maintain the 3D structure of the follicles during the whole process of in vitro growth what is crucial to ensure proper folliculogenesis progression and their ability to survive.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Culture TechniquesCulture MediaEmbryo TransferFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansOocytesOvarian FollicleOvarySwineCulture Media3DFEPFollicleIn vitro follicle growthMicrobioreactorsOvaryPig

Identifiers

PMID33604845
OpenAlexW3132440291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.