Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33604839›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2021

Quantifying mechanisms of cognition with an experiment and modeling ecosystem.

Emily R Weichart, Kevin P Darby, Adam W Fenton, Brandon G Jacques, Ryan P Kirkpatrick, Brandon M Turner, Per B Sederberg

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emily R WeichartDepartment of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5535-5704
Kevin P DarbyDepartment of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Adam W FentonDepartment of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Brandon G JacquesDepartment of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Ryan P KirkpatrickDepartment of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Brandon M TurnerDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Per B SederbergDepartment of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. pbs5u@virginia.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although there have been major strides toward uncovering the neurobehavioral mechanisms involved in cognitive functions like memory and decision making, methods for measuring behavior and accessing latent processes through computational means remain limited. To this end, we have created SUPREME (Sensing to Understanding and Prediction Realized via an Experiment and Modeling Ecosystem): a toolbox for comprehensive cognitive assessment, provided by a combination of construct-targeted tasks and corresponding computational models. SUPREME includes four tasks, each developed symbiotically with a mechanistic model, which together provide quantified assessments of perception, cognitive control, declarative memory, reward valuation, and frustrative nonreward. In this study, we provide validation analyses for each task using two sessions of data from a cohort of cognitively normal participants (N = 65). Measures of test-retest reliability (r: 0.58-0.75), stability of individual differences (ρ: 0.56-0.70), and internal consistency (α: 0.80-0.86) support the validity of our tasks. After fitting the models to data from individual subjects, we demonstrate each model's ability to capture observed patterns of behavioral results across task conditions. Our computational approaches allow us to decompose behavior into cognitively interpretable subprocesses, which we can compare both within and between participants. We discuss potential future applications of SUPREME, including clinical assessments, longitudinal tracking of cognitive functions, and insight into compensatory mechanisms.

Indexed as

CognitionEcosystemHumansIndividualityReproducibility of ResultsRewardCognitive assessmentComputational psychiatryModel-based analysisValidation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.