ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2021
Acoustic salience in emotional voice perception and its relationship with hallucination proneness.
Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The associations of stress, pleasure and emotion to voice-hearing: An ecological momentary assessment study.Psychology and psychotherapy · 2025Article
- Behind a Voice There is a Speaker: Why Vocal Emotion Research Needs to Become 'Personal'.Affective science · 2025Review
- Event-related brain activity in response to partners' speech in natural conversation.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2025Article
- Neurocognitive bases of self-monitoring of inner speech in hallucination prone individuals.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Attention Based Convolutional Neural Network with Multi-frequency Resolution Feature for Environment Sound Classification.Neural processing letters · 2022Article
- Hypersensitivity to passive voice hearing in hallucination proneness.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) are reported in approximately 70% of psychotic patients, but they also may occur in approximately 10% of the healthy general population. AVH have been related to altered processing of vocal emotions at both sensory and higher-order processing stages in psychotic patients. However, it remains to be clarified whether individuals with high hallucination proneness (HP) exhibit a similar pattern of alterations. We investigated the impact of HP on vocal emotional perception and specified whether manipulations of acoustic cues, such as sound intensity and duration, related to salience changes, affect the time course of voice processing reflected in event-related potentials (ERP) of the electroencephalogram. Participants varying in HP performed a task involving the categorization of emotional nonverbal vocalizations (neutral, anger, and amusement) differing in duration and intensity. ERP results demonstrated interactive effects of HP, valence, and acoustic cues on both early (N1, P2) and late (Late Positive Potential [LPP]) processing stages. Higher HP was associated with decreased N1 and increased P2 amplitudes in response to louder and longer neutral (vs. positive) vocalizations, as well as with a larger LPP to louder and longer negative (vs. neutral) vocalizations. These findings suggest that HP is associated with changes in the processing of vocal emotions that might be related to altered salience of acoustic representations of emotions. Consistent with prior studies with psychotic patients, these findings show that altered perception of vocal emotions may additionally contribute to the experience of hallucinations in nonclinical samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33604812What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.