Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33604737›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of colorectal disease2021

Rate of dissemination and prognosis in early and advanced stage colorectal cancer based on microsatellite instability status: systematic review and meta-analysis.

James W T Toh, Kevin Phan, Faizur Reza, Pierre Chapuis, Kevin J Spring

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of colorectal disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mismatch Repair Status and Surgical Outcomes in Localized Colorectal Cancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
  10. Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer: Actual and Future Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Comprehensive Analysis of Early-onset Colorectal Cancer: A Review.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2023
    Review
  16. Microsatellite Instability in Russian Patients with Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

James W T TohDepartment of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia. james.toh@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0110-2629
Kevin PhanDepartment of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Faizur RezaDepartment of Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Pierre ChapuisDiscipline of Surgery, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Kevin J SpringMedical Oncology, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, School of Medicine Western Sydney University and South Western Clinical School, University of New South Wales, NSW, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFor the past two decades, microsatellite instability (MSI) has been reported as a robust clinical biomarker associated with survival advantage attributed to its immunogenicity. However, MSI is also associated with high-risk adverse pathological features (poorly differentiated, mucinous, signet cell, higher grade) and exhibits a double-edged sword phenomenon. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the rate of dissemination and the prognosis of early and advanced stage colorectal cancer based on MSI status.

methodsA systematic literature search of original studies was performed on Ovid searching MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, American College of Physicians ACP Journal Club, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects DARE, Clinical Trials databases from inception of database to June 2019. Colorectal cancer, microsatellite instability, genomic instability and DNA mismatch repair were used as key words or MeSH terms. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline was followed. Data were pooled using a random-effects model with odds ratio (OR) as the effect size. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan ver 5.3 Cochrane Collaboration.

resultsFrom 5288 studies, 136 met the inclusion criteria (n = 92,035; MSI-H 11,746 (13%)). Overall, MSI-H was associated with improved OS (OR, 0.81; 95% CI 0.73-0.90), DFS (OR, 0.73; 95% CI 0.66-0.81) and DSS (OR, 0.69; 95% CI 0.52-0.90). Importantly, MSI-H had a protective effect against dissemination with a significantly lower rate of lymph node and distant metastases. By stage, the protective effect of MSI-H in terms of OS and DFS was observed clearly in stage II and stage III. Survival in stage I CRC was excellent irrespective of MSI status. In stage IV CRC, without immunotherapy, MSI-H was not associated with any survival benefit.

conclusionsMSI-H CRC was associated with an overall survival benefit with a lower rate of dissemination. Survival benefit was clearly evident in both stage II and III CRC, but MSI-H was neither a robust prognostic marker in stage I nor stage IV CRC without immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsMicrosatellite InstabilityDNA Mismatch RepairHumansImmunotherapyMicrosatellite RepeatsPrognosisColorectal cancerDNA mismatch repairGenomic instabilityLynch syndromeMicrosatellite instabilityPrognosisSporadic cancerSurvival

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.