Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33604721›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2021

Fosfomycin in continuous or prolonged infusion for systemic bacterial infections: a systematic review of its dosing regimen proposal from in vitro, in vivo and clinical studies.

Roberta Maria Antonello, Stefano Di Bella, Alberto Enrico Maraolo, Roberto Luzzati

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Difficult-to-TreatAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Roberta Maria AntonelloClinical Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Trieste University, 34127, Trieste, Italy.
Stefano Di BellaClinical Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Trieste University, 34127, Trieste, Italy. stefano932@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6121-7009
Alberto Enrico MaraoloFirst Division of Infectious Diseases, Cotugno Hospital, AORN dei Colli, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Roberto LuzzatiClinical Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Trieste University, 34127, Trieste, Italy.
University of Trieste · ITOspedale D. Cotugno · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fosfomycin (FOS) administered intravenously has been recently rediscovered for the treatment of systemic infections due to multidrug-resistant bacteria. Its pharmacokinetic properties suggest a time-dependent dosing schedule with more clinical benefits from prolonged (PI) or continuous infusion (CI) than from intermittent infusion. We revised literature concerning PI and CI FOS to identify the best dosing regimen based on current evidence. We performed a MEDLINE/PubMed search. Ninety-one studies and their pertinent references were screened. Seventeen studies were included in the present review. The activity of FOS against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria was evaluated in fourteen and five studies, respectively. Six studies evaluated FOS activity in combination with another antibiotic. Daily dosing of 12, 16, 18 or 24 g, administered with different schedules, were investigated. These regimens resulted active against the tested isolates in most cases. Emergence of resistant isolates has been shown to be preventable through the coadministration of another active antibiotic. FOS is a promising option to treat systemic infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. Coadministration with another active molecule is required to prevent the emergence of resistant bacterial strains. The results of our review suggest that a therapeutic regimen including a loading dose of FOS 8 g followed by a daily dose of 16 g or 24 g CI could be the best therapeutic approach for patients with normal renal function. The dosing regimens in patients with renal insufficiency and CI or PI superiority compared with intermittent infusion in clinical settings should be further investigated.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBacterial InfectionsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialFosfomycinHumansInfusions, IntravenousTime FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsFosfomycinContinuous infusionFosfomycinInfectionPharmacodynamicsPharmacokineticsProlonged infusion

Identifiers

PMID33604721
PMCPMC8139892
OpenAlexW3131658203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.