Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33604680›Full record

ArticleMolecular medicine reports2021

Size changes in miR‑21 knockout mice: Geometric morphometrics on teeth, alveolar bone and mandible.

Uwe Yacine Schwarze, Yuxin Ni, Yanmin Zhou, Lucia Terlecki-Ζaniewicz, Markus Schosserer, Matthias Hackl, Johannes Grillari, Reinhard Gruber

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Uwe Yacine SchwarzeDepartment of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, A‑1090 Vienna, Austria.
Yuxin NiDepartment of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, A‑1090 Vienna, Austria.
Yanmin ZhouDepartment of Stomatology, Union Shenzhen Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518051, P.R. China.
Lucia Terlecki-ΖaniewiczInstitute of Molecular Biotechnology, Department of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, A‑1190 Vienna, Austria.
Markus SchossererAustrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, A‑1200 Vienna, Austria.
Matthias HacklAustrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, A‑1200 Vienna, Austria.
Johannes GrillariAustrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, A‑1200 Vienna, Austria.
Reinhard GruberDepartment of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, A‑1090 Vienna, Austria.
Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration · ATMedical University of Vienna · ATInstitute of Molecular Biotechnology · ATUnion Hospital · CN

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 4072Austrian Science Fund FWF P 30623
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MicroRNA‑21 (miR‑21) is a small non‑coding RNA that is differentially expressed during tooth development, particularly during amelogenesis. Although orthodontic tooth movement and the innate immune response are impaired, miR‑21 knockout mice demonstrate no obvious skeletal phenotype. However, the consequence of miR‑21 knockout on tooth phenotype and corresponding alveolar bone is unknown. The current study utilized landmark‑based geometric morphometrics to identify anatomical dissimilarities of the three lower and upper molars, and the corresponding alveolar bone, in miR‑21 knockout and wild‑type control mice. The anatomical structures were visualized by microcomputer tomography. A total of 36 and 38 landmarks were placed on mandibular and maxillary molars, respectively. For the alveolar bone, 16 landmarks were selected on both anatomical sites. General Procrustes analysis revealed significantly smaller molars and dimensions of the alveolar bone in the mandible of the miR‑21 knockout mice when compared with wild‑type controls (P=0.03 and P=0.04, respectively). The overall dimension of the mandible was reduced by the lack of miR‑21 (P=0.02). In the maxilla, the dimension of the alveolar bone was significant (P=0.02); however, this was not observed in the molars (P=0.36). Based on principal component analysis, no changes in shape for any of the anatomical sites were observed. Dental and skeletal jaw length were calculated and no prognathism was identified. However, the fluctuating asymmetry of the molars in the mandible and the maxilla was reduced in the miR‑21 knockout mice by 38 and 27%, respectively. Taken together, the results of the present study revealed that the molars in the mandible and the dimension of the respective alveolar bone were smaller in miR‑21 mice compared with wild‑type littermates, suggesting that miR‑21 influences tooth development.

Indexed as

AnimalsBody SizeHumansMandibleMaxillaMiceMice, KnockoutMicroRNAsMolarToothMicroRNAsMIRN21 microRNA, mousedevelopmentgeometrics morphometricsmicroRNA‑21miR‑21tooth morphology

Identifiers

PMID33604680
PMCPMC7905328
OpenAlexW3132633480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.