ArticleCytokine: X2020
Value of serum cytokine biomarkers TNF-α, IL-4, sIL-2R and IFN-γ for use in monitoring bacterial load and anti-tuberculosis treatment progress.
Article in Cytokine: X, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biomarkers That Correlate with Active Pulmonary Tuberculosis Treatment Response: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2022Pooled it
- Systemic Host Proteomic Signatures as Dynamic Markers for Monitoring Pulmonary Tuberculosis Treatment Response.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Review
- IFN-γ and IL-6 as Key Predicting Biomarkers for Active TB Among PLWH: Results from Four Machine Learning Methods.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- The diagnostic value of CD101 in smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Increased serum interferon activity in sarcoidosis compared to that in tuberculosis: Implication for diagnosis?Heliyon · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Identification of immune biomarkers in recent active pulmonary tuberculosis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Serum pro-inflammatory biomarkers associated with improvement in quality of life in pulmonary tuberculosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Tuberculosis Treatment Monitoring and Outcome Measures: New Interest and New Strategies.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2022Review
- Delamanid suppresses CXCL10 expressionFrontiers in immunology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) patient serum cytokine levels may be predictive of anti-tuberculosis treatment progress. Here, serum levels of cytokines TNF-α, IL-4, sIL-2R and IFN-γ were measured then correlated to clinical TB manifestations, bacterial burden, chest imaging findings and clinical course. Study subjects included 67 newly diagnosed pulmonary TB (PTB) patients with active disease admitted to Beijing Chest Hospital for anti-TB chemotherapeutic treatment. Blood was drawn at 0 months (pre-treatment), 1-2 months (at any time between 1 and 2 month) and after 6 months completion of treatment and serum TNF-α, IL-4, sIL-2R and IFN-γ levels were measured in duplicate using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Correlation analysis was conducted to evaluate sensitivity and specificity of cytokine levels as predictors of disease activity and treatment progress. The results indicated that the pre-treatment serum TNF-α level of the smear-negative group was lower than that of the smear 1+ group, while serum TNF-α after 6 months completion of treatment and IFN-γ levels at 1-2 months and after 6 months completion of treatment were significantly lower, respectively, than at 0 months (before treatment) (P < 0.05). Using a cut-off value of 845 pg/ml, serum TNF-α level was predictive of treatment progress, with a sensitivity of 51%, specificity of 60% and AUC of 0.594 (P = 0.013). Meanwhile, using a cut-off value of 393 pg/ml, serum IFN-γ provided superior monitoring efficacy, with a sensitivity of 60%, specificity of 64% and AUC of 0.651 (P = 0.017). In conclusion, both serum TNF-α and IFN-γ levels might be useful biomarkers for monitoring treatment progress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.