Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33604537›Full record

ArticleKidney medicine

Cost-Utility of Dialysis in Canada: Hemodialysis, Peritoneal Dialysis, and Nondialysis Treatment of Kidney Failure.

Thomas W Ferguson, Reid H Whitlock, Ryan J Bamforth, Alain Beaudry, Joseph Darcel, Michelle Di Nella, Claudio Rigatto, Navdeep Tangri, Paul Komenda

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Home Sweet Home: A Program Report on Promoting the Uptake of Home Dialysis.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas W FergusonDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Reid H WhitlockSeven Oaks Hospital Chronic Disease Innovation Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Ryan J BamforthSeven Oaks Hospital Chronic Disease Innovation Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Alain BeaudryDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Joseph DarcelDepartment of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Michelle Di NellaSeven Oaks Hospital Chronic Disease Innovation Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Claudio RigattoDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Navdeep TangriDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Paul KomendaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Seven Oaks General Hospital · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RATIONALE &

objectiveThe kidney failure population is growing, necessitating the expansion of dialysis programs. These programs are costly and require a substantial amount of health care resources. Tools that accurately forecast resource use can aid efficient allocation. The objective of this study is to describe the development of an economic simulation model that incorporates treatment history and detailed modality transitions for patients with kidney disease using real-world data to estimate associated costs, utility, and survival by initiating modality. STUDY

designCost-utility model with microsimulation. SETTING & POPULATION: Adult incident maintenance dialysis patients in Canada who initiated facility-based hemodialysis (HD) or home peritoneal dialysis (PD) between 2004 and 2013.

interventionHD and PD. OUTCOMES: Costs (related to dialysis, transplantation, infections, and hospitalizations), survival, utility, and dialysis modality mix over time. MODEL PERSPECTIVE & TIMEFRAME: The model took the perspective of the health care payer. Patients were followed up for 10 years from initiation of dialysis. Our cost-utility analysis compared the intervention with receiving no treatment.

resultsDuring a 10-year time horizon, the cost-utility ratio for all patients initiating dialysis was $103,779 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) in comparison to no treatment. Patients who initiated with facility-based HD were treated at a cost-utility ratio of $104,880/QALY and patients who initiated with home PD were treated at a cost-utility ratio of $83,762/QALY. During this time horizon, the total mean cost and QALYs per patient were estimated at $350,774 ± $204,704 and 3.38 ± 2.05) QALYs respectively. LIMITATIONS: The results do not include costs from the societal perspective. Rare patient trajectories were unable to be assessed.

conclusionsThis model demonstrates that patients who initiated dialysis with PD were treated more cost-effectively than those who initiated with HD during a 10-year time horizon.

Indexed as

costCost-utilitydialysiseconomicskidney failureperitoneal dialysis

Identifiers

PMID33604537
PMCPMC7873742
OpenAlexW3105193512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.