Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33604511›Full record

ArticleNature catalysis2021

RetroBioCat as a computer-aided synthesis planning tool for biocatalytic reactions and cascades.

William Finnigan, Lorna J Hepworth, Sabine L Flitsch, Nicholas J Turner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature catalysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Robots and Minimal, Physics-Informed Features: A Hybrid Framework for Enzyme Catalysis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

William FinniganDepartment of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, 131 Princess Street, M1 7DN, Manchester, UK.
Lorna J HepworthDepartment of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, 131 Princess Street, M1 7DN, Manchester, UK.
Sabine L FlitschDepartment of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, 131 Princess Street, M1 7DN, Manchester, UK.
Nicholas J TurnerDepartment of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, 131 Princess Street, M1 7DN, Manchester, UK.

Funding

European Research Council 742987European Research Council 788231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the enzyme toolbox for biocatalysis has expanded, so has the potential for the construction of powerful enzymatic cascades for efficient and selective synthesis of target molecules. Additionally, recent advances in computer-aided synthesis planning are revolutionising synthesis design in both synthetic biology and organic chemistry. However, the potential for biocatalysis is not well captured by tools currently available in either field. Here we present RetroBioCat, an intuitive and accessible tool for computer-aided design of biocatalytic cascades, freely available at retrobiocat.com. Our approach uses a set of expertly encoded reaction rules encompassing the enzyme toolbox for biocatalysis, and a system for identifying literature precedent for enzymes with the correct substrate specificity where this is available. Applying these rules for automated biocatalytic retrosynthesis, we show our tool to be capable of identifying promising biocatalytic pathways to target molecules, validated using a test-set of recent cascades described in the literature.

Identifiers

PMID33604511
PMCPMC7116764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.