Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33604463›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2021

Analyses of interlinked actors in determining the potential business beneficiaries of small-scale pig farming systems in West Papua, Indonesia.

Deny Anjelus Iyai, Dwi Nurhayati, Maria Arim, Desni Saragih, Margaretha Orisu, Muhammad Djunaedi, Sangle Yohanes Randa, Irba Warsono, Yafed Syufi, Agustinus Murwanto and 18 more

RetractedOpen access · goldAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Deny Anjelus IyaiFaculty of Animal Science, Papua University, Jl. Gunung Salju, Manokwari, Papua Barat, Indonesia.
Dwi NurhayatiFaculty of Animal Science, Papua University, Jl. Gunung Salju, Manokwari, Papua Barat, Indonesia.
Maria ArimFaculty of Agriculture, Papua University, Jl. Gunung Salju, Amban, Manokwari, Papua Barat, Indonesia.
Desni SaragihFaculty of Animal Science, Papua University, Jl. Gunung Salju, Manokwari, Papua Barat, Indonesia.
Margaretha OrisuFaculty of Business and Economic, Papua University, Jl. Gunung Salju, Amban, Manokwari, Papua Barat, Indonesia.
Muhammad DjunaediFaculty of Animal Science, Papua University, Jl. Gunung Salju, Manokwari, Papua Barat, Indonesia.
Sangle Yohanes RandaFaculty of Animal Science, Papua University, Jl. Gunung Salju, Manokwari, Papua Barat, Indonesia.
Irba WarsonoFaculty of Animal Science, Papua University, Jl. Gunung Salju, Manokwari, Papua Barat, Indonesia.
Yafed SyufiFaculty of Letters and Cultures, Papua University, Jl. Gunung Salju, Amban, Manokwari, Papua Barat, Indonesia.
Agustinus MurwantoFaculty of Animal Science, Papua University, Jl. Gunung Salju, Manokwari, Papua Barat, Indonesia.
Stepanus PakageFaculty of Animal Science, Papua University, Jl. Gunung Salju, Manokwari, Papua Barat, Indonesia.
MulyadiFaculty of Animal Science, Papua University, Jl. Gunung Salju, Manokwari, Papua Barat, Indonesia.
Sintje RumetorFaculty of Animal Science, Papua University, Jl. Gunung Salju, Manokwari, Papua Barat, Indonesia.
Elfira SuawaFaculty of Animal Science, Papua University, Jl. Gunung Salju, Manokwari, Papua Barat, Indonesia.
Dwi RahardjoFaculty of Animal Science, Papua University, Jl. Gunung Salju, Manokwari, Papua Barat, Indonesia.
Alnita BaakaFaculty of Animal Science, Papua University, Jl. Gunung Salju, Manokwari, Papua Barat, Indonesia.
Rizki ArizonaFaculty of Animal Science, Papua University, Jl. Gunung Salju, Manokwari, Papua Barat, Indonesia.
Daniel SeserayFaculty of Animal Science, Papua University, Jl. Gunung Salju, Manokwari, Papua Barat, Indonesia.
Hanike MonimFaculty of Animal Science, Papua University, Jl. Gunung Salju, Manokwari, Papua Barat, Indonesia.
Yubelince RuntuboiFaculty of Forestry, Papua University, Jl. Gunung Salju, Amban, Manokwari, Papua Barat, Indonesia.
Frandz PawereFaculty of Animal Science, Papua University, Jl. Gunung Salju, Manokwari, Papua Barat, Indonesia.
Hieronymus YohanesFaculty of Animal Science, Papua University, Jl. Gunung Salju, Manokwari, Papua Barat, Indonesia.
Angelina TethoolFaculty of Animal Science, Papua University, Jl. Gunung Salju, Manokwari, Papua Barat, Indonesia.
Martha KayadoeFaculty of Animal Science, Papua University, Jl. Gunung Salju, Manokwari, Papua Barat, Indonesia.
Marlyn LekitooFaculty of Animal Science, Papua University, Jl. Gunung Salju, Manokwari, Papua Barat, Indonesia.
Onesimus YokuFaculty of Animal Science, Papua University, Jl. Gunung Salju, Manokwari, Papua Barat, Indonesia.
Lamberthus NuhuyananFaculty of Animal Science, Papua University, Jl. Gunung Salju, Manokwari, Papua Barat, Indonesia.
Muhammad Jen WajoFaculty of Animal Science, Papua University, Jl. Gunung Salju, Manokwari, Papua Barat, Indonesia.
State University of Papua · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pig production is a key livelihood sector and a source of economic and social beneficiaries, which has many interest and interlinked actors. The inventory which includes all resources and the roles played by actors is utmost important in pig farming system. Some stakeholders are interlinked in function, forming a complex system with multi-disciplinary actors. This research aims to distinctively map and provide clear involvement of actors or stakeholders in relation to their contribution towards pig business. As much as 32 institutions were interviewed based on the roles and resources of individuals working inside the organizations formally and informally. The parameters collected inlude the structure, status of law, and types of organization. As well as stakeholders' role, effect, importance, threat, and turn-back impact. The data obtained include resources sharing, duration, continuity, power, and interventions. Those related to intervention were policy, finance, space, time, access, satisfaction, knowledge, skills, threats, and power. In terms of innovation, the data collected include power, finance, space, time, access, satisfaction, knowledge, skills, threats, and power. And were stored in Microsoft excel worksheet and exported to Social Network Visualizer software version 2.5. The key and strategic stakeholder in pig business beneficiary were identified and determined based on power and interest. The following were identified in the first rank: crop farmers, private credit business, village officer, and local community. In the second rank, the factors identified include government (local and national), student community services, and security.

Indexed as

Interlinked actorsKey and strategic stakeholdersPig business beneficiarySocial network analysisWest papua pig production

Identifiers

PMID33604463
PMCPMC7876541
OpenAlexW3127686963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.